MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415352745 · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-25-0525

p53 Drives Lung Cancer Regression through a TSC2/TFEB-dependent Senescence Program

2025· article· en· W4415352745 on OpenAlexaff
Mengxiong Wang, Kathryn Bieging-Rolett, Alyssa M. Kaiser, Colleen A. Brady, John H. Lockhart, Sofia Ferreira, Kha The Nguyen, Arati Rajeevan, Simone A. Evans, Tianyu Zhao, Nitin Raj, Arielle Elkrief, Sam E. Tischfield, Marc Ladanyi, Michael G. Ozawa, Nam Q. Bui, Christopher T. Chen, Elsa R. Flores, Laura D. Attardi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Discovery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersNational Cancer Institute, Cairo UniversityNational Cancer InstituteGilead SciencesTobacco-Related Disease Research Program
KeywordsSenescenceLung cancerCellular senescenceRegressionCancerLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pharmacologic restoration of p53 tumor suppressor function is a conceptually appealing therapeutic strategy for the many deadly cancers with compromised p53 activity, including lung adenocarcinoma. However, the p53 pathway has remained undruggable, partly because of insufficient understanding of how to drive effective therapeutic responses without toxicity. In this study, we use mouse and human models to deconstruct the transcriptional programs and sequelae underlying robust therapeutic responses in lung adenocarcinoma. We show that p53 drives potent tumor regression by direct Tsc2 transactivation, leading to mTORC1 inhibition and Transcription factor EB (TFEB) nuclear accumulation, which in turn triggers lysosomal gene expression programs, autophagy, and cellular senescence. Senescent lung adenocarcinoma cells secrete factors to recruit macrophages, precipitating cancer cell phagocytosis and tumor regression. Collectively, our analyses reveal a surprisingly complex cascade of events underlying a p53 therapeutic response in lung adenocarcinoma and illuminate targetable nodes for p53 combination therapies, thus establishing a critical framework for optimizing p53-based therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCE: Cancer therapies based on targeting the p53 pathway remain elusive. To address this gap, we unravel the detailed sequence of events governing p53-induced tumor regression in lung adenocarcinoma. These analyses reveal a TSC2-mTORC1-TFEB axis underlying p53-driven senescence and tumor regression, which suggests new strategies to perfect p53-based combination therapies for lung adenocarcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer DiscoverySame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207