MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415354861 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.105976

Targeted ileal microbiome modulation by in ovo seaweed polyphenols (Fucus spiralis) as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics in broiler chickens

2025· article· en· W4415354861 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Lu, Renée M. Petri, Stephanie A. Collins

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie UniversityMitacsCanadian Poultry Research Council
KeywordsIn ovoAntibioticsBroilerPolyphenolMicrobiomeClostridiaFeed additiveIleumLactobacillus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managing gut health is a priority for the poultry industry, and nutritional provision during early life may facilitate positive, lasting modulation of the gut microbiome. This study evaluated the effects of in ovo seaweed (Fucus spiralis) and green tea (Camellia sinensis) polyphenols on the ileal and cecal microbiome of broiler chickens using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. On embryonic day 17.5, viable embryos received one of four treatments via the amniotic route (50 µL): (1) standard control (no injection), (2) diluent control, (3) seaweed polyphenols (2.5 mg/egg), or (4) tea polyphenols (2.5 mg/egg). Following hatch, the 28-day grow-out trial proceeded as a 5 × 2 factorial arrangement (in ovo supplementation × dietary challenge). The in ovo supplementation factor comprised the initial four treatments plus (5) antibiotic control, derived from a subset of the no-injection control provided in-feed antibiotics (BMD® 110G). Each in ovo supplementation treatment was assigned to either a standard diet with unoxidized oil or the same diet containing oxidized oil, serving as a model for stress. Seaweed polyphenols suppressed Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (P < 0.05), a genus associated with necrotic enteritis in the ileum of 28-day-old birds, without altering dominant microbial taxa. This effect was comparable to what was achieved by 28 days of in-feed antibiotics (P > 0.05). The same effect was not observed with tea polyphenols. In the ceca, only the antibiotic control significantly altered the microbial composition compared to the standard control group, while neither polyphenols had a significant impact. The oxidized oil had minimal impact on both the ileal and cecal microbiome. Hatchability and growth performance (weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio) were not impacted by treatments (P > 0.05). Our findings suggest that a single dose of seaweed polyphenols supplemented in ovo is a viable alternative to the prolonged use of in-feed antibiotics for suppressing necrotic enteritis-associated microbes. This highlights early life as a critical window for nutritional provision to manage poultry gut health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207