MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415364055 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1636909

Neutrophil proteins as potential biomarkers for a sputum-based tuberculosis screening test

2025· article· en· W4415364055 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Chambers, Farina Karim, Matilda Mazibuko, Zoey Mhlane, Lindiwe Madziwa, Mahomed‐Yunus S. Moosa, Sashen Moodley, Monjurul Hoque, Emily Wong, Andriëtte Hiemstra, Stephanus T. Malherbe, Belinda Kriel, Kim Stanley, Ilana C. van Rensburg, Ayanda Shabangu, Bronwyn Smith, Gerhard Walzl, Nelita du Plessis, Timothy R. Sterling, Mark Hatherill, Alasdair Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersMedical Research CouncilUniversiteit StellenboschSouth African Medical Research CouncilWellcome TrustCRDF Global
KeywordsSputumAsymptomaticTuberculosisConfidence intervalMycobacterium tuberculosisCohortTriage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The development of a rapid and affordable assay to screen participants for Q12 additional testing could streamline TB screening in resource-limited settings and for community-wide health screens. Sputum remains the primary testing sample, making it potentially ideal for a screening testing. Neutrophils are highly expanded in sputum from individuals with pulmonary TB with high specificity and have potential as a biomarker for TB. Methods: Three neutrophil associated proteins, neutrophil gelatinase associated-lipocalin (NGAL), the protein heterodimer S100A8/A9 and the protein death ligand-1 (PDL-1), were measured in presumptive TB cases from participants attending a primary healthcare clinic in Durban, South Africa, using commercially available ELISAs on a total of 79 participants from a 109-participant cohort. Participants with microbiologically confirmed TB were sampled after 1 month of treatment. Proteins were also measured in tongue swab samples in participants from this cohort at baseline. Baseline results were confirmed in a second TB cohort which recruited a total of 51 participants with presumptive TB from the Western Cape. Finally, we investigate sputum neutrophil protein levels in individuals with community diagnosed asymptomatic TB. Results and discussion: Significant increases in all proteins were detectable in sputum from clinic-diagnosed TB participants relative to symptomatic controls. Performance approached the WHO target product profile for a TB triage test, with ROC AUCs reaching 0.866 (with a 95% confidence interval of 0.7683 - 0.9633) in the case of S100A8/A9. Sputum protein levels did not correlate with bacterial burden and did not consistently decrease following one month of drug therapy. Only PDL-1 was detectable in mouth swab samples. Sputum neutrophil proteins tended to be elevated in participants with asymptomatic community diagnosed TB, as compared to asymptomatic community controls within the Vukuzazi cohort using a sample size of 42 participants, although this was not significant. This study provides a proof of principle that neutrophil proteins can be easily measured in standard sputum samples and have potential as a screening test for TB. However, more work is needed to explore whether this approach, using these three neutrophil proteins, can meet the WHO target product profile for a triage test worth developing further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Immunology→Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→