Prevalence and spectrum of congenital heart disease in individuals with distal chromosome 22q11.22-23 deletions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study is aimed to determine the spectrum of congenital heart disease associated with distal 22q11.22-23 deletions flanked by low copy repeats, LCR22 D-H. We analyzed cardiology findings in 128 unrelated individuals with distal LCR22 D-H deletions. A total of 62 were newly described and 66 were derived from previous reports. We found that deletions which included LCR22-D as the proximal endpoint were the most prevalent in the cohort (104/128, 81.3%). Clinically relevant congenital heart disease was identified in 48 individuals (37.5%, 95% CI 29-46%), which is lower than the prevalence reported for typical, proximal LCR22 A-D deletions (p=3.7E-4), especially for conotruncal defects (13/128, 10.2%; p=7.1E-13). Mild to moderate CHD predominated, including ventricular septal defects (22/128), bicuspid aortic valve (9/128) and mild cardiomyopathy (3/128). Persistent truncus arteriosus was the most prevalent (n=8/13) conotruncal heart defect, but other anomalies also occurred in singleton cases. These findings support the need for cardiac evaluation in all individuals with distal 22q11.22-23 deletions, increased use of clinical genetic testing in syndromic individuals with these findings, and molecular studies in model systems. The results demostrate that reduced gene dosage of distal 22q11.21-23, particularly within the D-E region including MAPK1 and HIC2 convey risk for CHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".