Design and Decoding of Full-Diversity Construction-D Lattices on Block-Fading Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel framework for constructing algebraic lattices based on Construction-D, leveraging nested linear codes and prime ideals from algebraic number fields. We focus on the application of these lattices in block-fading (BF) channels, which are characterized by piecewise-constant fading across blocks of transmitted symbols. This approach results in a semi-systematic generator matrix, providing a structured foundation for high -dimensional lattice design for BF channels. The proposed Construction-D lattices exhibit the full diversity property, making them highly effective for error performance improvement. To address this, we develop an efficient decoding algorithm designed specifically for full-diversity Construction-D lattices. Simulations indicate that the proposed lattices notably enhance error performance compared to full-diversity Construction-A lattices, especially in high-diversity scenarios. Interestingly, the anticipated performance gain from increasing the number of nested code levels was only observed in the two-level case. We believe that this is due to the amplified impact of error propagation during successive cancellation at higher levels. These findings highlight the promise of Construction-D lattices as an effective and practical coding strategy for enhancing communication reliability in BF channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".