A multicenter observational cohort study in survivors of Down Syndrome-associated acute leukemia (ALTE22C1): a report from the Children’s Oncology Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS) is a common genetic disorder resulting from an extra copy of genetic material from all or part of chromosome 21. Individuals with DS have a higher burden of co-occurring structural birth defects, neurocognitive delay, and chronic health conditions when compared to those without DS, as well as a 10 to 20-fold excess risk for acute leukemia (AL). Few studies have reported the late effects of cancer treatment in DS-AL survivors, and even fewer have compared outcomes to children with DS and no cancer history. The Children’s Oncology Group study ALTE22C1 was developed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: This study leverages both registry and site-based DS-AL survivor recruitment and a prospective/retrospective cohort design to compare chronic health conditions and neurocognitive outcomes experienced by DS-AL survivors to age and sex-matched individuals enrolled to a DS cohort for which cancer is exclusionary. Survivors 6–39 years old, ≥ 3 years from end of AL treatment, and in remission are eligible. Participants complete a medical conditions survey and neuropsychological battery by parent proxy and may also participate in an in-person physical and neurocognitive assessment. Biological samples are collected to evaluate molecular features associated with outcomes. DISCUSSION: This cooperative group study will identify the prevalence and severity of medical and neurocognitive outcomes in DS-AL survivors compared with non-DS AL and DS controls without cancer history. Results are anticipated to inform clinical practice guidelines for DS-AL survivors and improve survivor outcomes through mitigation of outcome disparities in this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Children’s Oncology Group study ALTE22C1 is registered under the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05702645.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".