Integrating evidence-based nursing bundles to reduce hospital-acquired infections in critical care and surgical ward settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) remain a major cause of patient morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs, with critical care units and surgical wards particularly vulnerable due to invasive procedures, compromised immunity, and prolonged hospital stays. Evidence-based nursing bundles structured, standardized sets of clinical interventions have consistently demonstrated effectiveness in reducing HAI incidence when applied systematically. This study examines the integration of such bundles with Internet of Things (IoT) devices to enhance compliance monitoring, improve real-time decision-making, and strengthen infection prevention strategies in high-risk hospital environments. The proposed framework incorporates standardized nursing bundles for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) protocols, and surgical site infection (SSI) reduction, combined with IoT-enabled sensors, wearable devices, and environmental monitoring systems. Real-time data from hand hygiene dispensers, patient vitals, and cleanliness audits are captured, securely transmitted to cloud-based platforms, and analyzed using machine learning algorithms to identify deviations from established care protocols. Embedding these IoT data streams into nursing workflow dashboards enables clinical teams to receive actionable alerts, track bundle compliance, and initiate timely interventions. Simulated pilot testing suggests that such integration can significantly reduce HAI rates, enable faster detection of protocol breaches, and optimize resource allocation for infection control efforts. This fusion of IoT capabilities with evidence-based nursing bundles not only enhances clinical accountability and supports precision nursing but also provides a foundation for data-driven quality improvement initiatives. Future research should address interoperability standards, cost-effectiveness analysis, and robust privacy safeguards to ensure scalable, sustainable adoption of IoT-assisted infection prevention systems across diverse healthcare settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".