MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415377253 · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.111752

A chemoproteomic strategy for identifying protein covalent binding targets of clozapine: An approach for advancing clozapine toxicity research

2025· article· en· W4415377253 on OpenAlexafffund
Steven Lockhart, Yasser Tabana, Amir Tabatabaei-Dakhili, Dinesh Babu, Newton H. Tran, Othman Eldalal, F. G. West, John R. Ussher, Khaled Barakat, Richard P. Fahlman, Arno G. Siraki

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsToxicityProteomicsOxidative stressProtein–protein interactionCovalent bondImmune systemPlasma protein bindingTarget protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia affects a significant proportion of individuals, wherein a subset of patients are described as treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic, which is reserved for these patients and is superior in its anti-suicidal activity. However, it carries numerous serious warnings and is well-known for its risk of drug-induced agranulocytosis. The mechanism of toxicity is unclear and could be due to clozapine’s protein covalent binding and off-target effects through its reactive metabolites produced from neutrophil myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. We hypothesize that identifying and analyzing the protein-clozapine adducts will contribute to our understanding of toxicity pathways. We have developed a novel clickable clozapine (Click-CLOZ) derivative and have designed click chemistry protocols for protein identification. The HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukemia) cell line and isolated human neutrophils express MPO significantly and were used to identify the protein covalent targets of Click-CLOZ. In HL-60 cells, LC/MS analysis revealed many Click-CLOZ-bound proteins (compared to the vehicle control). Some captured proteins were known for their roles in DNA replication, immune responses and oxidative stress, such as cathepsin G, MPO, ribophorin I and P1-MCM3. In neutrophils, Click-CLOZ bound proteins included MPO, S100, and DEFA1B, which are also associated with neutrophil-mediated oxidative stress and immune responses. In conclusion, the application of click chemistry proteomics has facilitated a novel approach to identify multiple clozapine-bound protein targets that will be used to advance our understanding of the toxicity of clozapine. • Clozpaine was modified to produce “Click-CLOZ” for click chemistry protein ID • Click-CLOZ protein binding was conducted in human neutrophils and HL-60 cells • Click-CLOZ demonstrates similar cytotoxicity and metabolic behaviour as CLOZ • MPO catalyzed Click-CLOZ protein adduct formation and was a target itself • Neutrophil extracellular trap proteins are susceptible to CLOZ adduction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicology LettersSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207