Unearthing Ecofeminist Voice in Jessica Zafra’s “Portents”: Language in Nature-Culture Relationship Construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the ecofeminist lens, the study examines the short story “Portents” by Jessiza Zafra and determines how the nature-culture relationship within the Philippine literary context was reconstructed. Through close reading and textual analysis, the study attempted to address a critical gap in ecofeminist discourse by situating the analysis in a non-Western setting, unraveling the narrative’s ecological and societal implications. The findings highlight the narrative techniques, such as stream-of-consciousness, symbolic imagery, and dark humor, that bridge the protagonist’s struggles with environmental and social issues, which the author employed. The metaphor of pregnancy in the short story, which represents creation and destruction, is central to the study. It underscores the interconnectedness of gender and nature. It also critiques the patriarchal systems and humanity’s exploitative behavior toward the environment, through the use of an apocalyptic setting of war and ecological collapse to allegorize the instability of natural and cultural systems. Moreover, it discusses how the story challenges traditional binaries such as nature versus culture and gender versus agency, supporting the idea that humans and nature are deeply intertwined. Through this lens, Zafra reframes narratives surrounding motherhood, ecology, and human relationships, showcasing resistance and resilience in both women and the natural world. Lastly, the study presents a transformative critique of societal norms, advocating for a reimagined perspective of ecology and cultural interdependence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".