Novel proteomic characterization of multiple myeloma bone marrow interstitial fluid links prognosis to coagulation pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most prevalent hematological malignancy, carries high morbidity with variability in clinical progression among patients. This necessitates accurate risk stratification for effective therapy and life planning. While extensively genomically and transcriptomically characterized, MM remains modestly studied from a proteomic perspective. As proteomics is a closer measure of phenotype than genomic and transcriptomic assessments, addressing this gap in the literature may yield new insights into disease biology and novel biomarkers. METHODS: Herein, we applied a new sample preparation approach for mass-spectrometry based proteomics to bone marrow interstitial fluid (BMIF) from patients with MM or its precursors. RESULTS: We achieved deep coverage of the proteome, identifying > 11,000 protein groups (PGs) across our cohort, with an average of ~ 8900 PGs per sample. Of these, 194 PGs were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). These survival-associated PGs were enriched for those involved in coagulation, and clustering newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) based on coagulation-related proteins revealed three distinct groups characterised by globally high, medium, and low intensity of coagulation-related proteins. The group with low intensity of coagulation-related PGs had significantly reduced OS (log-rank p = 0.00078). Clustering was independent of measured clinical covariates, including chemotherapeutic regimens used, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS stage), International Normalised Ratio (INR), and age, among others. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the value of fluid-based proteomic assessment of MM and suggest that coagulation-related PGs could serve as valuable novel biomarkers for risk stratification in multiple myeloma, warranting further investigation into this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".