MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415383114 · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000001434

Riluzole as a pharmacological therapy for spinal cord injury: where does this therapy stand?

2025· article· en· W4415383114 on OpenAlexaff
Karlo M. Pedro, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Guilherme Reghelin Goulart, Michael G. Fehlings

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRiluzoleNeuroprotectionSpinal cord injuryClinical trialMultimodal therapySpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a disabling condition associated with long term neurological impairment, functional disability, and reduced quality of life. Despite decades of research, pharmacological interventions with proven clinical efficacy remain limited. This review critically evaluates the current evidence supporting riluzole as a neuroprotective agent for acute traumatic and nontraumatic SCI. We synthesize findings from preclinical and clinical studies, assess the progress towards clinical translation, and outline key challenges and research opportunities for future implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: Riluzole, an FDA-approved agent for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels and modulates glutaminergic transmission, two mechanisms central to the pathogenesis of secondary injury in SCI and in nerve cell degeneration in nontraumatic forms of SCI, including degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate functional and histopathological improvements following riluzole administration. Phase I/II trials have provided evidence for its safety and tolerability in acute SCI patients, while the RISCIS and CSM-PROTECT trials, two landmark multicenter randomized controlled studies, along with their secondary analyses, revealed promising multidomain improvements in motor function, independence, and quality of life indices. Sub-studies have also established pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic frameworks for individualized dosing, and early biomarker analysis suggests potential for predictive stratification. SUMMARY: Riluzole represents a promising candidate for neuroprotection in traumatic and nontraumatic SCI. The consistency of favorable trends across multiple domains and strong support from preclinical studies highlight riluzole's value in orphan diseases such as SCI. Future directions should focus on refining the therapeutic window, optimizing PK/PD modeling, and identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit. Its implementation in a multimodal treatment paradigm for acute SCI will be crucial for optimizing management protocols in this highly disabling condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in NeurologySame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207