Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueScience Communication · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Alberta
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipCentre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of CambridgeEconomic and Social Research CouncilHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan TeknologiCentre for Marine SocioecologyNational Science and Technology CouncilAustrian Science FundLembaga Pengelola Dana PendidikanFundación Española para la Ciencia y la TecnologíaNOMIS StiftungUniwersytet ŁódzkiGovernment of AlbertaFédération Wallonie-BruxellesUniversitetet i BergenUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaUniversität zu LübeckUniverzita Karlova v PrazeConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentUniversität WienQuadrature Climate FoundationUniwersytet WarszawskiAston UniversityAarhus Universitets ForskningsfondEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAarhus UniversitetVictoria University of WellingtonCity University of Hong KongDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitUniversity of TasmaniaHarvard UniversityAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaBundesamt für EnergieAustralian Research CouncilUniversity of WarwickSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyJohn Templeton FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungBoston UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaTurun YliopistoBranco Weiss Fellowship – Society in ScienceUniversität HamburgCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCarleton CollegeVetenskapsrådetFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniwersytet Śląski w KatowicachBill and Melinda Gates FoundationHarvey Mudd CollegeTrinity Western UniversityAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversité Catholique de LouvainNational Science FoundationUK Research and InnovationUniversity of Delaware
KeywordsScience communicationSocial mediaCollectivismPublic awareness of scienceDigital mediaSocial science educationInformation scienceScience educationMedia coverage
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis 68-country survey ( n = 71,922) examines science information diets and communication behavior, identifies cross-country differences, and tests how such differences are associated with sociopolitical and economic conditions. We find that social media are the most used sources of science information in most countries, except those with democratic-corporatist media systems where news media tend to be used more widely. People in collectivist societies are less outspoken about science in daily life, whereas lower education is associated with higher outspokenness. Limited access to digital media is correlated with participation in public protests on science matters. We discuss implications for future research, policy, and practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.998
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
