Correction: Prospective evaluation of efficacy, safety, cumulative laser energy, and stone-free rates in the post-market SOLTIVE™ superpulsed laser system registry: insights from team of worldwide endourological researchers’ (T.O.W.E.R.) research consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SFRs), ablative performance, and patient outcomes following ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or mini-PCNL with the first commercially available TFL system, SOLTIVE™ SuperPulsed Laser System (Gyrus ACMI, Inc. doing business as Olympus Surgical Technologies America).but should have read as This prospective study conducted by the investigators of the Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers' (T.O.W.E.R.) research consortium on behalf of the Endourological Society aimed to evaluate the stone-free rates (SFRs), ablative performance, and patient outcomes Correction: Urolithiasis (2025) 53:56 h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 / s 0 0 2 4 0 -0 2 5 -0 1 7 2 0 -5In the original version of this article, "mini-PCNL and PCNL patients" were mistakenly added in the introduction section.The last sentence of the introduction section, which previously read as This prospective study conducted by the investigators of the Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers' (T.O.W.E.R.) research consortium on behalf of the Endourological Society aimed to evaluate the stone-free ratesThe original article can be found online at h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 / s 0 0 2 4 0 -0 2 5 -0 1 7 2 0 -5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.097 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".