MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415386645 · doi:10.1177/09596836251378010

Expanding the Yukon tree ring Blue Intensity network to assess divergence effects and enhance climate reconstructions

2025· article· en· W4415386645 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emily Reid, Brian H. Luckman, Marcel Kunz, Jan Esper, Rosanne D’Arrigo, Caroline Leland, Rob Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Holocene · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDendroclimatologyProxy (statistics)Climate changeDendrochronologyAridPaleoclimatologyDivergence (linguistics)PrecipitationPeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Divergence Problem (DP) – classically defined as a breakdown in the relationship between tree growth and temperature in recent decades – poses a major challenge to developing robust tree-ring based climate reconstructions. This is particularly relevant in northwestern North America (NWNA), a climatically sensitive yet underrepresented region in dendroclimatological networks. To address this gap and the implications of the DP, we developed a network of 34 white spruce sites across southern and central Yukon, using latewood Blue Intensity (LWBI) as a high-resolution proxy for maximum summer temperatures. Sites span a broad elevational range, allowing assessment of how proximity to local treeline influences climate sensitivity. LWBI chronologies from sites within 100 m of upper treeline exhibit the strongest ( r 2 = 0.46) and most temporally stable relationship with June-August (JJA) temperatures. In contrast, lower elevation chronologies display weaker coherence and declining sensitivity in the recent period that is consistent with the DP. Ring width chronologies express poor correlations and temporal stability and are not recommended for temperature reconstructions in this region. Despite near-treeline LWBI sites presenting the best option for optimising reconstructions, there is slight evidence of a non-linear relationship between LWBI and JJA temperatures, leading to the underrepresentation of extreme warm summer temperatures. The results herein offer a strategy for minimising the DP and enhancing the reliability of temperature reconstructions in NWNA through targeted site selection. However, in a warming world, a progressive weakening in temperature limitation – even at optimal sites – will likely lead to a degradation in calibration accuracy in future reconstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HoloceneSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207