Interleukin-36 upregulates type-I interferon responses in systemic lupus erythematosus by promoting the accumulation of self-nucleic acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Several studies have reported an up-regulation of interleukin (IL)-36 in the serum of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we sought to define the mechanisms whereby IL-36 may contribute to the over-activation of type I Interferon (IFN) responses observed in SLE. Methods We carried out single-cell (sc)RNA-seq in healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with IL-36 (n=5 donors). We compared the genes and transcriptional networks that were induced by IL-36 with those that were upregulated in a published SLE scRNA-seq dataset (n=33 cases and 11 controls). In follow-up studies, we validated the effects of IL-36 on monocytes by real-time PCR (n=9 donors) and flow-cytometry (n=6). Results Classical monocytes were the immune population most affected by IL-36 treatment (n=203 Differentially Expressed Genes). In these cells, IL-36 upregulated transcriptional networks (regulons) driven by IRF7, a key activator of type I IFN responses. A similar upregulation of IRF7 regulons was observed in the monocytes of SLE cases, where measurements of IL-36 and IRF7 activity were significantly correlated (r=0.35, P=0.02). Experimental follow-up studies in human monocytes showed that IL-36 downregulates multiple RNAse genes ( RNASE1, RNASE6, RNASET2 ). IL-36 treatment of monocytes also increased the percentage of apoptotic cells (45% vs 37% in untreated cells; P=0.001), which are a critical source of self-nucleic acids. Conclusion We find that IL-36 promotes monocyte apoptosis while downregulating self-nucleic acid clearance. Thus, IL-36 contributes to the accumulation of self-nucleic acids, a key driver of type I IFN responses in SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".