MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415404050 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c07146

Molecular Insights into the Protic Organic Ionic Plastic Crystal (POIPC): Effect of Dopants and Vacancies

2025· article· en· W4415404050 on OpenAlexafffund
Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Abdessamia Rhazaoui, Sadollah Ebrahimi, Yasmine Benabed, Jean‐Christophe Daigle, Armand Soldera

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlastic crystalDopantIonic bondingElectrolyteCrystal (programming language)DopingPhase (matter)Hydrogen bond

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In recent years, significant research effort has been dedicated to the development of robust, high-performance solid electrolyte batteries. A wide range of materials, including polymers, ceramics, and glasses, etc., have been tested and characterized as potential solid electrolyte candidates. In this respect, organic ionic plastic crystals (OIPCs) have attracted significant research attention owing to their promising properties. However, the OIPCs from different crystal classes, composed of distinct cations and anions, may display widely different phase behaviors and properties. Herein, following our previous work on pure POIPC, we conduct extensive molecular dynamics simulations, in conjunction with experimental methods, to investigate the effect of dopants and vacancies on the structural, thermodynamic, and dynamical properties of POIPC [DBUH]-[FSI], consisting of the protic [DBUH] + cation with labile proton (H + ) on the nitrogen atom. Simulations have been performed for the LiFSI doping fractions of 1.31%, 2.52%, 5.39%, and 10.55%. Additionally, the effect of Schottky vacancies was examined at concentrations of 0.23% and 0.46% for the 1.31% and 2.52% doped systems. The simulated solid–solid and the solid–liquid phase transition temperatures are in very good agreement with the DSC data. Our findings indicate that the effect of the vacancy is more pronounced at the lower doping levels. Hydrogen bonding analysis reveals that the protic N2–H1 site forms the strongest hydrogen bond in the system, with N2–H1--O being the dominant hydrogen bond. Using rotational autocorrelation functions (RACFs), we identify distinct solid phases associated with different rotational modes in the systems, confirming the presence of at least three distinct solid phases across the doping range. Translational dynamics analysis affirms that the [FSI] anion is the most mobile component of the system. The activation energy ( E a ) computed using the Arrhenius plot, is in considerable agreement with the experimental data. The lithium cation transference number ( t Li + ) agrees very well with the experimental analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207