A Retrospective Review to Determine the Safety of Continuous Dexmedetomidine Infusions on the Inpatient Ward in Pediatric Patients With Acute and Chronic Pain Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that has clinical efficacy in various clinical scenarios in infants and children including procedural sedation, prevention of emergence delirium, and sedation during mechanical ventilation. Additional investigation has suggested its utility in various acute pain, chronic pain, and palliative care scenarios. Despite these beneficial properties, many pediatric institutions limit its use to the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We present the development of a hospital-based pathway for the administration of dexmedetomidine on the inpatient ward. Additionally, we present preliminary dosing parameters and safety data using dexmedetomidine along this clinical pathway. Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients ≤ 21 years of age who received a dexmedetomidine infusion for the management of acute or chronic pain outside the ICU setting. In addition to demographic data, information collected included the patient’s primary disease process, primary pain etiology, and comorbid conditions. Information to identify adverse effects included the need to stop the infusion, administration of vasoactive medications, provision of airway or respiratory support, or escalation of care with ICU admission or notification of the rapid response team. Results: The study cohort included 26 patients (median age 5 years). The majority of patients (46%) received dexmedetomidine for 1 or 2 days. The most common primary disease conditions were neuroblastoma (n = 12), acute leukemia (n = 6), and sickle cell disease (n = 4). The starting infusion rate was generally 0.1 µg/kg/h, titrated up in 0.05 µg/kg/h increments to a maximum infusion rate of 0.6 µg/kg/h. For hospice patients with an allow natural death (AND) order, the maximum infusion rate was 1 µg/kg/h. Adverse effects (AEs) were reported in 11 patients, with the most common being hypotension (n = 4) and delirium or hallucinations (n = 4). No pharmacologic intervention was required due to AEs. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience supports the safe use of dexmedetomidine infusions outside the ICU setting following a standardized protocol that includes patient selection, dosing parameters, monitoring, and training of physicians and nurses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".