MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415424866 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.70069

<i>European Journal of Heart Failure</i> Consensus Statement. Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy for Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation: Review of Evidence and Call to Action

2025· article· en· W4415424866 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Luedde, Stefan Agewall, Giuseppe Ambrosio, Antoni Bayés‐Genís, Claudio Borghi, Elisabetta Cerbai, Gheorghe Andrei Dan, Heinz Drexel, Péter Ferdinandy, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Juan Carlos Kaski, Roland Klingenberg, João Morais, William A. Parker, Mark C. Petrie, Bianca Rocca, Anne Grete Semb, Michele Senni, Christian Sohns, Patrick Sulzgruber, Juan Tamargo, Marco Metra, Michael Böhm, Dobromir Dobrev, Samuel Sossalla

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteSurgical Specialties (Canada)
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCardio-Pulmonary InstituteH. Lundbeck A/SNovo NordiskRocheDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEli Lilly and CompanyBoehringer Ingelheim EspañaDaiichi Sankyo EuropeServierHorizon TherapeuticsPfizerModernaMedtronicCytokineticsAstraZenecaAmarin CorporationBoston Scientific CorporationNovo Nordisk USABayer HealthCareEuropean CommissionSanofiNational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNovartisBristol-Myers SquibbBoehringer IngelheimAmgen
KeywordsHeart failureAtrial fibrillationPharmacotherapyConcomitantContext (archaeology)Ejection fractionSpironolactoneComorbidityCardiac resynchronization therapyCall to action

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are major global health challenges with rising prevalence and significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. Despite advances in HF management, AF remains a critical comorbidity that worsens outcomes and requires ad hoc treatment strategies, increasing the risk of non-adherence and side effects. While rhythm control strategies in AF have gained attention for their prognostic benefits in HF, the pharmacological treatment of HF in patients with AF, including the benefit of rhythm versus rate control, remains underexplored. The relationship between HF and AF lacks sufficient evidence and targeted research to assess the optimal treatment strategies. This narrative review critically examines current HF pharmacotherapy in the context of AF, focusing on the four cornerstone treatments and modifiers of prognosis for HF with reduced ejection fraction: beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/sacubitril-valsartan, aldosterone antagonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Although these therapies are well-established in HF patients, their efficacy in patients with concomitant AF requires further prospective investigation. The unique challenges posed by AF, including arrhythmia-induced remodelling and cardiomyopathy, necessitate a more individually tailored treatment. We also highlight critical knowledge gaps and the need for dedicated clinical trials specifically assessing HF therapies in AF subgroups, such as paroxysmal, long-standing persistent and permanent AF, and the benefit of heart rate and rhythm control strategies. The future of precision medicine in HF-AF management lies in bridging these evidence gaps through targeted research and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207