MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415425677 · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107432

Production of bio-oil and biochar from digestate via pyrolysis in a mechanical fluidized bed reactor

2025· article· en· W4415425677 on OpenAlexaff
Daniele Battaglia, Lucio Zaccariello, Maria Laura Mastellone, Naomi B. Klinghoffer, Franco Berruti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocharDigestatePyrolysisFluidized bedCatalysisResource recoveryGreenhouse gasBiofuel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rising pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions calls for effective strategies to valorize organic waste streams. This study investigates the potential of slow pyrolysis to convert digestate, a byproduct of anaerobic digestion, into biochar and bio-oil using a mechanically stirred fluidized bed reactor. Experiments were done at 400, 450, 500, and 550 °C, with an additional run at 500 °C which employed a catalyst bed composed of process-derived biochar. As the temperature increased from 400 to 500 °C, the biochar yield decreased from 68 % to 50 %, while the bio-oil yield increased from 21 % to 30 %. The presence of the biochar bed further reduced biochar formation by approximately 5 %, enhancing vapor production. GC-MS analysis revealed that the bio-oil was primarily composed of carbonyl compounds, sterols, alcohols, and phenolic derivatives. These results demonstrate the influence of temperature and a biochar catalyst on product distribution and composition. Overall, the study supports pyrolysis as a viable pathway for digestate valorization and sustainable carbon recovery, contributing to emissions mitigation and improved resource management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207