MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415426295 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.130

#1163 Baseline estimated GFR and the prognostic impact of rapid increases in serum creatinine after major elective surgery: a multicohort study

2025· article· en· W4415426295 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philip Vestergaard Munch, Simon Sawhney, Uffe Heide‐Jørgensen, Simon Kok Jensen, Samira Bell, David L. Yeung, Zhi Tan, Matthew T. James, Christian Fynbo Christiansen

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatinineRenal functionKidney diseaseCohortCohort studyKidneyUrineOutpatient clinic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after major surgery and is associated with increased mortality. Currently, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria define AKI as an absolute creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours, a relative creatinine increase ≥50% known or presumed to have occurred within 7 days, or a urine output <0.5 ml/kg/h for at least 6 hours. However, it remains contested whether small absolute creatinine increases should be viewed as equivalent to relative creatinine increases—especially for low baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) where such creatinine changes relate to smaller eGFR changes. Here, we used a multinational collaboration to investigate this uncertainty. Method We conducted a multinational population-based cohort study including adult patients from Denmark, Alberta (Canada), Grampian, and Tayside & Fife (United Kingdom) undergoing major elective surgery. The inclusion of patients undergoing major elective surgery allowed for accurate assessment of baseline eGFR and postoperative changes in creatinine. This is because it is standard practice in all the included cohorts to have a recent outpatient creatinine measurement before surgery and to monitor creatinine levels in the days following surgery. We ascertained the most recent outpatient eGFR before surgery using the 2009 creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. We determined both the highest relative increase in creatinine within 7 days and the highest absolute increase in creatinine within 2 days during the first 7 days after the day of surgery. The outcome of interest was death within 90 days after surgery. Logistic regressions were performed to construct heatmaps depicting age-, sex-, year-, and surgery type-standardized 90-day mortality according to absolute and relative creatinine increases across pre-operative baseline eGFR levels. Results We identified 314,136 surgical procedures (172,544 procedures from Denmark, 124,119 from Alberta, 9891 from Grampian, and 7582 from Tayside & Fife) performed in 276,988 patients with 13,906 deaths within 90 days. Across the populations, the median age ranged from 66 to 70 years, and 40 to 44% were female. Absolute creatinine increases: Compared to no change in creatinine, an absolute increase of 0.3 mg/dl (26.5 µmol/l) within 2 days was associated with a consistent 2.5–3.5 percentage point (%p) absolute increase in mortality for eGFR between 15 and 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Figs 1 and 2). The increase in mortality was >3.5%p at eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m² and <2.5%p at eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m², although the precision of these estimates was low. These absolute increases in mortality corresponded to a relative increase in mortality of 25% for a baseline eGFR of 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, 160% for a baseline eGFR of 90 ml/min/1.73 m2, and 244% for an eGFR of 120 ml/min/1.73 m2. Relative creatinine increases: The absolute increases in mortality between a 50% relative creatinine increase and no change within 7 days decreased with eGFR from 9.6%p for a baseline eGFR of 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 3.5%p for a baseline eGFR of 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Figs 1 and 2). After this point, it increased to 5.3%p for a baseline eGFR of 120 ml/min/1.73 m2. The corresponding relative increases in mortality rose from 134% for a baseline eGFR of 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 255% for a baseline eGFR of 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, after which it remained at the same level. Conclusion Across baseline eGFR levels >15 ml/min/1.73 m2, both an absolute creatinine increase of 0.3 mg/dl and a relative increase of 50% were associated with a considerably higher mortality than no change. Yet, the magnitude of the increase in risk was substantially higher for a 50% increase compared with a 0.3 mg/dl increase at low baseline eGFR. This distinction should be emphasized in future guidelines to improve the consistency of clinical interpretations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207