MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415426658 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.016

#3345 Nefecon provides kidney benefit irrespective of baseline eGFR in patients with IgAN: a subanalysis of the NefIgArd study

2025· article· en· W4415426658 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Barratt, Richard Lafayette, Heather N. Reich, Jens Kristensen, Russell Jones, Jürgen Floege, Vladimı́r Tesař, Hernán Trimarchi, Hong Zhang, Brad H. Rovin

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteinuriaRenal functionKidney diseasePlaceboObservational studyClinical endpointKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a chronic immune complex-mediated kidney disease characterized by galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A1 (Gd-IgA1) deposition in the glomeruli. The Peyer's patches of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue are a major site of Gd-IgA1-producing B cells. Nefecon is an oral targeted-release formulation of budesonide that targets drug release into the distal ileum. Nefecon has been shown to reduce the loss of kidney function in adults with primary IgAN who are at risk of disease progression. Results from the Phase 3 NefIgArd study demonstrated that nefecon 16 mg/day reduced proteinuria and preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 9 months of treatment. Proteinuria and eGFR benefit were sustained for up to 15 months of observational follow-up in patients with primary IgAN. Results showed similar treatment effect in those with baseline eGFR <60 or ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Here, we present results from a subanalysis of the NefIgArd study evaluating the efficacy of nefecon 16 mg/day by baseline eGFR deciles, with a focus on the upper and lower eGFR ranges. Method NefIgArd study design and endpoints have been previously described. Briefly, eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgAN, eGFR 35–90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula), proteinuria ≥1 g/24 hours despite optimized renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition, and well-controlled blood pressure. Patients received nefecon 16 mg or placebo daily for 9 months (n = 182 per treatment group) in addition to supportive care (RAS inhibition), followed by a 15-month off-drug observational period on supportive care only. For this subanalysis, patients were divided into eGFR deciles based on the overall population at baseline (defined as the geometric mean of the two most recent measurements before randomization). This subanalysis reports urine protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR) and eGFR results across the subgroups of patients in the upper and lower deciles of kidney function at baseline in the NefIgArd study. Results Median eGFR was 55.49 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: 45.93–69.84 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the overall population and was balanced across nefecon and placebo groups. Patients from the full analysis population were divided into groups based on the decile boundaries of baseline eGFR: above and below 38, 43, 47, 51, 55, 60, 66, 72, and 82 mL/min/1.73 m2. In general, UPCR reduction at 9 and 12 months and eGFR benefit at all time points was observed with nefecon relative to placebo (Table 1). UPCR and eGFR benefit with nefecon relative to placebo was also observed in patients within the lower and higher baseline eGFR decile boundaries, specifically at 9, 12, and 24 months (Fig. 1). Conclusion This NefIgArd subanalysis demonstrated that the efficacy of a 9-month nefecon treatment course in reduction of proteinuria and preservation of kidney function was independent of baseline eGFR, both at the end of 9 months of treatment and throughout the remaining 15 month off-drug observation period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207