MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415427118 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf170

The Genome Sequence of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, <i>Adelges tsugae</i> Annand 1924

2025· article· en· W4415427118 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryan M. T. Brunet, Dustin T Dial, Gaelen R. Burke, Carol D. von Dohlen, Julia Douglas Freitas, Haley Sanderson, Afiya Razia Chida, Samantha Jones, Fergal J. Martin, Leanne Haggerty, Stephen W. Scherer, Jiannis Ragoussis, Steven J.M. Jones, Robert G. Foottit, Nathan P. Havill

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilEuropean Research Executive AgencyEuropean CommissionMedical Research CouncilEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaGenome CanadaUtah Agricultural Experiment StationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWellcome TrustUtah State University
KeywordsSyntenyGenomeContigHemipteraSequence assemblyAphidAcyrthosiphon pisumWhole genome sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genome of the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) is presented in 10 chromosomal pseudomolecules along with 132 unplaced scaffolds for a combined length of 216.56 Mb. The genome is highly contiguous with an N50 of 20.54 Mb and its longest scaffold 37.41 Mb in length. The assembly recovered 97.7% of benchmarked universal single-copy Hemiptera orthologs (BUSCO) with an overall completion score of 98.6%. On the basis of chromosomal synteny with other aphid genomes, the hemlock woolly adelgid's genome is composed of eight autosomes and two sex (X) chromosomes. Annotation of the assembly identified 11,800 coding genes, 1,930 noncoding genes, and 20,403 mRNA transcripts. The mitogenome is also presented in a single, annotated, circular contig 25,980 bases in length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207