First nearctic record of <i>Camilla atrimana</i> (Diptera: Camillidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of Camillidae are among the least known Diptera in the Nearctic Region.Worldwide, this small family consists of four extant genera and approximately 40 species (Pape et al. 2011).Most species occur in the Palearctic and Afrotropical regions, and the family was not recorded in the New World until McAlpine (1960) noted the occurrence of Camilla glabra (Fallen) in Ottawa, Ontario.Camilla glabra is a widespread Palearctic species and its occurrence in the New World presumably represents an accidental introduction.The family was included in McAlpine (1987) on the basis of this population.Barraclough and Wheeler (1995) later described two endemic species of Afrocamilla Barraclough from Arizona and California and one of Camilla Haliday from Baja California, and Barraclough and Fitzgerald ( 2001) described an additional species of Afrocamilla from Colorado.Barraclough and Wheeler (1995) examined the status of C. glabra , noting that specimens were only collected in a small area of Ottawa between 1954 and 1965 and suggesting that this population is likely extirpated.Thus the current known Nearctic fauna of Camillidae consists of three species of Afrocamilla and one of Camilla.Here we record and key an additional species of Camilla in the Nearctic region.The specimens of Camilla atrimana Strobl reported here were collected with a Vortis suction sampler (Burkard Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) during an invertebrate survey of experimental grass plots at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute.They are deposited in the University of Guelph Insect Collection, Guelph, ON (DEBU); we also examined material from the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids & Nematodes, Ottawa, ON (CNCI). Key to NearcticCamilla species 1 Scutum mostly shining.Wing apex rounded.Legs yellow.................
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".