MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415430148 · doi:10.21083/jeso.v154i.7627

First records of direct kleptoparasitism in yellowjacket wasps (Vespidae: Vespula)

2023· article· W4415430148 on OpenAlexaff
Savannah Lindsay Burroughs, Morgan D. Jackson, Jéssica P. Gillung

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKleptoparasitismForagingHymenopteraNetting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

jeso2023005Yellowjacket wasps (Vespula Thomson (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)) have been thoroughly studied in terms of feeding ecology.They forage for two main foodstuffs: carbohydrates and protein (Edwards 1981).The workers collect carbohydrates from both anthropogenic and natural sources (e.g., concentrated sugars from honeydew-producing insects, plant sap, honey, and sugary drinks and food) to provide themselves and the brood with energy (West-Eberhard 1978;Akre et al. 1981;Raveret Richter 2000).Alongside carbohydrates, some species groups of yellowjackets (e.g., V. squamosa (Drury) and V. vulgaris (Linnaeus)) also collect protein-rich food from anthropogenic sources, often becoming nuisances at picnic tables and garbage cans while taking advantage of discarded or unattended food (Morse et al. 1977;Akre et al. 1981).With these nutrient sources abundant in urban and suburban areas, yellowjackets have become prolific in cities and towns (Morse et al. 1977;Akre et al. 1981).Despite the abundance of anthropogenic food sources, yellowjackets, as opportunistic foragers, also turn to natural sources of protein, preying on or scavenging for other arthropods (Coelho and Hoagland 1995;Raveret Richter 2000;Pusceddu et al. 2018).Yellowjackets (e.g., V. germanica (Fabricius) and V. vulgaris) often specialize in preying on or scavenging for honey bees (Apis mellifera Linnaeus) (Coelho and Hoagland 1995;Pusceddu et al. 2018).Yellowjacket workers have been recorded isolating and preying on lone worker bees carrying injured nestmates, sick or weakened honey bees, or scavenging dead bees from below hives.Yellowjackets rarely succeed in attacking honey bee hives directly as honey bees have been shown capable of driving off direct assaults (Pusceddu et al. 2017).Despite this low success rate at hive entrances, yellowjackets have been recorded entering the hive and stealing honey, noted as a form of kleptoparasitic foraging behaviour (Clapperton et al. 1989;MacIntyre and Hellstrom 2015;Pusceddu et al. 2017).Kleptoparasitism, also known as cleptobiosis (Breed et al. 2012), is defined as the theft of a resource that requires energy to collect, classically the forceful theft of prey (Iyengar 2008).The host and kleptoparasite might be of the same species or of different species, though they cannot be relatives as the benefits of increased indirect fitness may

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of OntarioSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207