MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415430210 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.043

PALLIATIVE CARE AFTER A HIP FRACTURE IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION: WHICH PATIENTS WOULD BENEFIT THE MOST?

2025· article· en· W4415430210 on OpenAlexaff
Jack Boulet, Étienne L. Belzile, Norbert Dion, Catherine Morency, Mélanie Berube, Alexandra Tremblay, Philippe Beauchamp-Chalifour, Stéphane Pelet

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHip fractureCohortPalliative careRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyUnivariate analysisFemoral neckComorbidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hip fractures have a high rate of mortality. Typically, most patients presenting with a hip fracture regardless of their comorbidities are surgically treated. Lately, there has been an increase interest of palliative care for hip fractures among frail elderly patients. A growing body of research states that a certain type of elderly patients could benefit more from a palliative approach; that is, patients with neurocognitive disorders (NCD), with multiple medical comorbidities, who are dependent in ADL/IADL and/or with a reduced pre-fracture mobility. These categories remain to be confirmed. Our research thus aims to identify the patient who would benefit most from a palliative care approach instead of a surgery. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2015 and 2021. Patients older than 65 years old admitted by the palliative care team for a hip fracture treated non-operatively were included (PG). This cohort was compared to a matched cohort (for age, sex and fracture type) who underwent surgery but died within three months of the procedure (SDG) and another matched cohort who survived more than three months (SAG) following surgery. The primary outcome was prevalence of NCD in the three cohorts. We secondarily explored comorbidities and administrative data. Analyses were performed through univariate and multivariate models with SAS University (alpha 0.05). The patients in the PG (n=129) were 88.2±7.2 years old, 71.3% were females and 61.2% had a femoral neck fracture. The patients in the SDG (n=95) and SAG (n=107) were well matched (p>0.05). The PG differed from the SDG (n=95) and SAG (n=107) regarding NCD (85.3% vs 57.9% vs 36.4%, p<0.01) and presence of behavioral and psychotic dementia related symptoms (19.4% vs 5.3% vs 3.7%, p<0.01). There were more coronary arterial disease (43.2% vs 29.5%, p=0.03) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in SDG compared to PG (26.6 vs 14.7%, p=0.03). Pre-fracture mobility, autonomy and living situation significantly differed between the groups (p<0.01). Median survival was six days in PG and 17 days in SDG. To this day, all patients in SAG are still alive. All groups lost autonomy and mobility. There were more complications in the SDG compared to PG. End-of-care trajectory was death or hospice for most patients in PG and SDG. More than 30% of the SAG group could not return home at discharge. This work shows that presence of a NCD and a diminished pre-fracture autonomy strongly support counselling for palliative care. When patients are carefully selected and a multidisciplinary expert approach (including palliative care specialists) is established, palliative care for hip fracture surgeries are ethical and provide a safe and effective option for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207