MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415434181 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.1347

#3609 Cognitive functions in multymorbidity patients with atrial fibrillation depending on the presence of concomitant chronic kidney disease stages 3A, 3B and 4

2025· article· en· W4415434181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С. А. Литвинова, K. K. Dzamikhov, А. И. Кочетков, S S Eremina, E. Yu. Ebzeeva, О. Д. Остроумова

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney diseaseAtrial fibrillationConcomitantCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentIncidence (geometry)Renal functionTrail Making TestStroop effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background сognitive impairment (CI) is one of the significant public health problems. Multimorbidity patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of developing CI, which can lead to deterioration in quality of life, difficulties in adherence to medication regimens and a higher incidence of adverse drug reactions, which determines the need to diagnose cognitive deficit in these multimorbid patients. Aims to assess the impact the stage of concomitant CKD on cognitive functions (CF) in patients with AF. Materials and methods we included 142 patients of both sexes ≥18 years old with AF in combination with CKD stages C3 and C4; 47 (33.1%) men and 95 (66.9%) women, aged 58 to 99 years (median age 84 [76; 90] years). Patients were divided into 3 groups: (i) with CKD C3a (n = 50), (ii) with CKD C3b (n = 50), (iii) with CKD C4 (n = 42). All patients underwent cognitive assessment including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trial Making Test (parts A, B), Category Fluency, Word-List Recall and Stroop color-word conflict. Results patients with CKD C4 had a statistically significantly lower number of points on the MMSЕ, compared with patients with CKD C3a (27 [24;28] vs. 28 [26;29] points, respectively, P = 0.048). Among patients with CKD C4, there were statistically significantly fewer patients who scored ≥29 points on the MMSЕ, compared with patients with CKD C3a (8 (19%) vs. 19 (38%) patients, respectively, P = 0.047). Patients with CKD C4 reproduced a statistically significantly smaller number of words an hour after memorization than patients with CKD C3a (2 [0;3] vs. 3 [0;4] words, respectively, P = 0.017). To complete the TMT part A test, patients with CKD C4 required a statistically significantly longer time than patients with CKD C3a (89 [61;117] vs. 71 [58;91.5] seconds, respectively, P = 0.047). Conclusion the results obtained in this study indicate an adverse effect of concomitant CKD C4 on CF in patients with AF and a deterioration in CF with increasing severity of CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207