MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415435477 · doi:10.7759/cureus.95165

Effect of Same-Day Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy on Resource Utilization in Rapid Access Palliative Radiotherapy Clinics Using a Radiation Oncologist-Initiated Automated Planning Script

2025· article· en· W4415435477 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Golshan, Nick Chng, Leigh Bartha, L. Drummond, David Hoegler, Nathan Becker, Benjamin Mou

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsPositive Living NorthKelowna General HospitalCanadian Association of Nurses in OncologyBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyPalliative careResource useRadiation oncologyRadiation dose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Rapid access palliative (RAP) radiotherapy (RT) clinics enable patients to access urgent same-day consultation, simulation, and treatment. This study aimed to examine the effect of same-day volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) implementation using the Northern Plan Automation Service Treatment Planning Automation Service (NoPAUSE-TPAS) on patient throughput in RAP-RT clinics at a regional cancer center. Methods:This retrospective study included all patients seen in RAP-RT clinics between February and August 2024 following the introduction of NoPAUSE-TPAS, compared to a data set from January to July 2019, prior to the introduction of NoPAUSE-TPAS. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Measures of resource utilization and quality pertaining to consultations, computed tomography simulation slots, and treatment delivery were assessed. RESULTS: RAP-RT clinics saw 202 patients in 2024 and 213 in 2019. In 2019, 195 (91.5%) patients received RT to 249 sites, compared to 189 (93.6%) patients who received RT to 246 sites in 2024. Most patients (n=148 (69.5%) in 2019; n=143 (70.8%) in 2024) received RT to one site. Bone was the most common site treated (n=176 (70.7%) in 2019; n=177 (71.9%) in 2024). The most common fractionation was 8 Gy/1 (n=128 (51.5%) in 2019; n=156 (63.4%) in 2024). Of the bone metastases, 117 (66.5%) were treated with a single fraction in 2019, compared to 144 (81.4%) in 2024. Most patients (n=185 (94.9%) in 2019; n=171 (90.5%) in 2024) started RT the same date as consultation. Within the 2024 cohort, 133 (54.1%) sites were treated with an unplanned technique and 113 (45.9%) with VMAT. Of the sites treated, 192 (78%) were eligible for NoPAUSE-TPAS. Of the eligible sites, 113 (58.9%) received treatment with VMAT, with 96 (84.9%) of these delivered on the same date as consultation. The median time for NoPAUSE-TPAS optimization was 12 minutes. Conclusions:Same-day VMAT using NoPAUSE-TPAS was implemented in RAP-RT clinics with no scheduling changes impacting patient throughput and similar resource utilization compared to historical data. Utilizing automation technology to improve efficiency can enable same-day VMAT for palliative RT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicManagement of metastatic bone diseaseFrench-language works237,207