FAVOURABLE ONCOLOGIC AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TREATMENT FOR SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS OF THE HAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the hand poses a challenging problem due to the high risk of postoperative functional deficits and complications. Negative-margin resection combined with radiotherapy is the standard of care for these tumors in other anatomic locations. However, the lack of readily expendable tissue, poorly defined tissue planes, and close proximity to key anatomical structures make this strategy problematic in the hand. Additionally, radiotherapy of the hand is thought to be associated with an increased risk of overall complications and poorer functional outcomes compared to other anatomic sites. Therefore, this study aims to assess the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients treated for STS of the hand. We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at our tertiary referral sarcoma center from 1986–2021. All patients above the age of 18 with a biopsy-proven STS of the hand distal to the radiocarpal joint were identified from a prospectively updated database and included. All patients underwent planned negative margin surgery with or without perioperative radiotherapy. Outcomes of interest include local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and functional outcomes. Functional scores were evaluated using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Seventy-one patients were treated for STS of the hand, with a mean follow-up of 73.4 months. Of those included, 77% presented with primary non-metastatic disease, and 62% had prior surgery outside our institution. 73.2% of patients underwent limb-sparing surgery, whilst 21.1% had a ray resection, and 5.6% underwent a hand amputation. 26 patients (36%) had primary wound closure and 26 (36%) required a separate soft tissue reconstruction procedure. 54 (76.1%) patients underwent perioperative radiotherapy (62% preop), and only 14% received chemotherapy. 58 (81.7%) procedures achieved a negative margin, while the remaining 13 (18.3%) had a microscopic positive margin. Wound complications were observed in 14% of patients. One patient had a vascular-related complication requiring grafting. Local recurrence-free survival at 10 years was 86.9%. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 76% and 57%, respectively. At the final follow-up, the mean functional scores were: TESS – 96.8, MSTS – 89, and DASH − 10.4. In contrast to prior studies, these results demonstrate a relatively low complication rate following resection of STS of the hand, even when combined with perioperative radiotherapy. The data also supports that perioperative radiation can be safely administered to patients with STS of the hand to facilitate low rates of local recurrence and excellent functional results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".