MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415439098 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.068

PATIENTS WITH ASSOCIATED SPINE OR OTHER MAJOR JOINT PAIN HAVE EQUIVALENT OUTCOMES TO PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED HIP PAIN AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY

2025· article· en· W4415439098 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Remedios, Ivan Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHip arthroscopyFemoroacetabular impingementHip painHip surgeryArthroscopyPain scoreOrthopedic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be assessed using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It has recently been found that pain in other major joints, including the spine and knee, may negatively affect patient outcomes post-operatively. The objective of our study was to assess post-operative outcomes in patients treated arthroscopically for FAI and to determine whether presence of pain in other joints affects PRO scores pre- and post-operatively. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI between 2016–2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Patients were included if they had available pre-operative pain diagrams. Patients were then grouped into Musculoskeletal Morbidity (MSM) grades (Grade 1: hip pain only; Grade 2: hip and other major joint pain; Grade 3: hip and spine pain; Grade 4: hip, spine, and other major joint pain). Patients were excluded if they had: a history of ipsilateral hip surgery; <2 mm of joint space; and if they underwent an additional surgery other than the contralateral leg within 6 months of primary surgery. Primary outcomes included pre- and post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). One hundred-seventeen patients were evaluated with a mean age of 37.16 years at the time of the surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 31.5 months. Patients with MSM Grade 4 had significantly lower (i.e. worse) iHOT-33 scores (21.54±13.38) than MSM Grade 1 patients (40.07±20.97) at the pre-operative time point (p=0.006). Interestingly, all patients improved post-operatively (MSM 1–3 p<0.001; MSM 4 p=0.005). While MSM grade 4 patients had lower post-operative iHOT-33 scores (54.88±30.26) compared to Grades 1–3 (68.95±25.78, 68.28±28.99, 68.01±30.50, respectively). Treatment of FAI with hip arthroscopy yields improved iHOT-33 scores and patients with associated spine or other major joint pain have equivalent outcomes to patients with isolated hip pain. Patients with hip, spine, and other major joint pain have inferior outcomes compared with patients with MSM grade 1–3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207