MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415439230 · doi:10.21083/jeso.v144i0.3747

New Ontario records for <i>Nanophyes M. marmoratus</i> (Goeze, 1777) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), introduced into North America for classical biological control of purple loosestrife

2016· article· W4415439230 on OpenAlexaffabout
E. St. Louis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological pest controlIntroduced speciesBiodiversityNatural enemiesInvasive species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1992, Nanophyes marmoratus marmoratus (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), the Purple Loosestrife Flower Weevil, native to Eurasia (Thompson et al. 1987), was identified as a candidate for biological control of Purple Loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria (L.) (Lythraceae), an alien weed invasive in North America.Although N. m. marmoratus was assessed as having a lower potential impact than the other biological control candidates, Neogalerucella calmariensis L., N. pusilla (Duftschmid) (Chrysomelidae) and Hylobius transversovittatus (Goeze) (Curculionidae), it was still released due to its high likelihood of establishment (Blossey and Schroeder 1995).From 1994-2005, N. m. marmoratus was released in several US states (Skinner 1996;Blossey 2001).In Canada, 720 adults were released in 1997 in southern Manitoba in three marshy sites (Lindgren et al. 2002).In Ontario there is no record of this species ever having been released (D.Mackenzie, personal communication).The present study is the first to monitor the spread of N. m. marmoratus in Canada since its release in North America, thus addressing Corrigan et al. 's (2013) recommendation to assess its establishment in Canada.Nanophyes m. marmoratus adults are small (1.4-2.1 mm long), with light yellowish-brown elytral markings and a long rostrum.Females (Fig. 1a) are slightly larger and with more yellow on the elytra than males (Fig. 1b).The life cycle (egg to adult emergence) is about four weeks.The weevils first appear in mid-spring, when they mate on the flowering inflorescences before laying eggs singly in flower buds (Batra et al. 1986;Blossey and Schroeder 1995).The young whitish larvae feed on the stamens and ovary of unopened flower (Wilson et. al. 2004).The adult beetles emerge, feed on foliage and mate in late August before overwintering in leaf litter (Lindgren et al. 2002).In 2012 and 2013 several Purple Loosestrife populations in eastern Ontario were surveyed.Only the well-established, leaf-feeding Neogalerucella beetles were expected to be found but Nanophyes m. marmoratus was repeatedly discovered as well, on Purple Loosestrife flowers from mid-June to late August.One of these specimens, from Pakenham, ON, 45.3333N 76.2833W, 10 September 2012 (1 female, CNC), was reported by Douglas et al. (2013) along with specimens collected in Quebec in 2011 from the area between the Ottawa and St. Lawrence Rivers (Fig. 2).Nanophyes m. marmoratus has now been identified at eighteen sites in eastern Ontario (Fig. 2) and quantified in fourteen of them.The average density was 0.78 ( 0.55) weevils per stem (n=513 stems), with a range of 0-14 weevils per stem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of OntarioSame topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207