MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A042: Evolution of resistance in brain tumors: Effects of the blood brain barrier

2025· article· en· W4415444727 on OpenAlexaff
Madison Stoddard, Lin Yuan, T. Ryan Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood–brain barrierDrugPharmacokineticsDrug resistancePenetration (warfare)PopulationBrain tumor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Therapeutic treatment of brain tumors is uniquely challenging due to the presence of the blood brain barrier (BBB), which impedes drug penetration of the brain. This typically results in lower drug concentrations and slower time to steady-state in the brain relative to the body. In this analysis, we investigate the effects of the blood brain barrier on the evolution of resistance in brain tumors and accordingly seek optimal drug transport and clearance properties. Methods: To investigate the relationship between a drug’s BBB penetration parameters and its efficacy against brain tumors, we simulated drug penetration and tumor response in terms of total volume and resistant fraction. Brain pharmacokinetics (PK) are simulated by a two-compartment model in which the body and brain are represented. A series of differential equations transfer between compartments—across the blood brain barrier—and correspond to active and passive transport. Drug clearance in the brain and body are also considered. The tumor kinetics model consists of sensitive and resistance cells which are in competition, represented by a logistic growth function. For sensitive cells, the growth rate is reduced by the concentration of drug while resistant cells are unaffected. Results: We demonstrate that drug PK in the brain is characterized by a latency phase followed by steady-state dynamics. The tumor growth may continue during this latency. As the drug exerts its effect, sensitive cells die off. As the sensitive population is reduced, the effect of drug properties such as transport across the BBB and clearance diminishes. In general, the effect of active transport into the brain was found to be small compared to passive diffusion. Conclusions: Due to a longer time-to-steady state in the brain, therapeutic concentrations are reached more slowly in the brain. BBB penetration parameters impact tumor volume in the treatment phase where sensitive cells are present in significant number. Citation Format: Madison Stoddard, Lin Yuan, T Ryan. Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty. Evolution of resistance in brain tumors: Effects of the blood brain barrier [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A042.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207