MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415447226 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2025.124857

Fibroin/chitosan blend membranes for perstractive removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions

2025· article· en· W4415447226 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhaohui Fei, Beata Malczewska, Swapnali Hazarika, Xianshe Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Membrane Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMembraneMass transferStripping (fiber)Aqueous solutionThioureaWastewaterDownstream processingPhase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mercury (Hg(II)) contamination of water poses a significant environmental threat due to its high toxicity and bioaccumulation. In this study, fibroin/chitosan blend membranes were developed for the efficient removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions via perstraction using thiourea as a stripping agent at the downstream side to enhance Hg(II) removal. A resistance-in-series model was used to quantify and analyze the contributions of the individual resistance component in the overall mass transfer process. The research findings emphasized that while the membrane imparted a significant resistance to perstractive Hg(II) removal, the external mass transfer resistances (i.e., liquid phase boundary layer resistances, interfacial mass transfer resistance for Hg(II) release from the membrane at the downstream side) were also significant. The latter aspect was especially important when a thin membrane was used. While the liquid boundary effects could be reduced by proper management of the liquid phase hydrodynamics, the use of thiourea as a stripping agent was shown effective to facilitate Hg(II) release from the membrane, thereby minimizing the mass transfer resistance to Hg(II) perstraction at the downstream side of the membrane. This work offers a sustainable eco-friendly approach to valorization of renewable biopolymers derived from biomass wastes for the treatment of Hg(II) containing wastewater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Membrane ScienceSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207