MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415449897 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.2342

SUN-326 The additive value of real-time elastography to thyroid ultrasound in detecting malignancy in nodules over 20 mm in diameter

2025· article· en· W4415449897 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolaos Angelopoulos, Dimitrios G. Goulis, Sarantis Livadas, Rodis Paparodis, Ioannis P. Androulakis, Anastasios Boniakos, Juan Carlos Jaume, Ιoannis Iakovou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyroid nodulesNodule (geology)ThyroidMalignancyElastographyGrading (engineering)Ultrasound

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: N. Angelopoulos: None. D.G. Goulis: None. S. Livadas: None. R. Paparodis: None. I. Androulakis: None. A. Boniakos: None. J.C. Jaume: None. I. Iakovou: None. Purpose. Ultrasonography (US) is the most accurate and cost-effective imaging method for identifying thyroid nodules. The difficulty in determining which nodules to sample for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has prompted the introduction of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), which assesses the malignancy risk associated with thyroid nodules. Real-time elastography (RTE), coupled with strain ratio (SR) measurements, offers a means to evaluate the nodule stiffness and potentially discern their likelihood of being malignant. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of RTE and SR, combined with the TIRADS grading systems, in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods. From 1094 patients with thyroid nodules referred for thyroid ultrasound at a University Hospital, those with thyroid nodules ≥20 mm in diameter were enrolled. Each nodule was categorized according to European (EU)- and American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS systems, ranging from 2 to 5. Nodules’ semiquantitative SRs were evaluated together with RTE. The thyroid nodule diagnosis was documented by post-thyroidectomy histopathological examination and/or US-guided FNA according to the Bethesda classification of the examined smears.Results. The study involved 267 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 14.3 years; 46 males and 221 females) with 308 nodules categorized into EU-TIRADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Of these nodules, 22 proved malignant, and 286 benign. The elastography ratio exhibited high predictive performance in diagnosing thyroid malignancy (p<0.001) at a threshold value of >0.84 (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 73.4%). In the 168 nodules with EU-TIRADS 3, this threshold had 100% sensitivity and 75.1% specificity in discriminating malignant thyroid nodules.Conclusion. Combining TIRADS with data derived from RTE reduces unnecessary FNAs and surgeries in patients with thyroid nodular disease. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207