SUN-453 Isolated Psychosis As New Onset Cushing Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: M. Luna Cuadros: None. S. Haddady: None. Introduction: Although Cushing Syndrome manifestations can be florid and severe, isolated psychiatric features are less common as main clue for diagnosis. Clinical case: 31-year-old female without medical history presented for agitation, paranoia and disorganized behavior. Physical exam was unrevealing except for overweight. Workup for toxic/metabolic causes included CT Abdomen that showed a 2.6cm right adrenal mass and Brain MRI showed a 4mm hypoenhancing focus in the pituitary. Hormonal workup showed AM cortisol 15.6 ug/dl, ACTH <5 pg/ml, DHEA-S 19.5 mcg/dl raising concern for ACTH independent Cushing Syndrome. Prolactin, IGF-1, free T4, aldosterone/renin and plasma metanephrines were normal. Further testing revealed elevated LNSC 0.42 and 0.5 mcg/dl, Dexamethasone suppression test: cortisol 16 ug/dl, dexamethasone 375 ng/dl. Patient was started on aripiprazole and evaluated by Surgery. Patient had right laparoscopic adrenalectomy for ACTH independent Cushing Syndrome. Given possibility of temporary adrenal insufficiency due to atrophy of remaining adrenal gland, patient was started on perioperative steroids with taper to hydrocortisone 20mg qam and 10mg qpm. On follow up, reported that hallucinations have resolved, now on hydrocortisone 20mg qam and 5mg qpm with plans to reevaluate with cosyntropin stimulation test. Conclusion: Psychiatric features in Cushing Syndrome can present as prodrome, during the course or even after resolution. A thorough endocrine workup can determine CS cause in the setting of adrenal and pituitary lesions. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".