MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415451281 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1527

SAT-044 Neurophysin I: A Reliable, Novel, and Robust Biomarker for OxytocinAn Analysis of a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Trial

2025· article· en· W4415451281 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cihan Atila, Andi Nikaj, Svenja Leibnitz, Matthias E. Liechti, Mirjam Christ‐Crain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsBiomarkerOxytocinArea under the curveClinical trialPlaceboBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: C. Atila: None. A. Nikaj: None. S. Leibnitz: None. M. Liechti: None. M. Christ-Crain: None. Background: Oxytocin (OXT) deficiency is a recently identified new neuroendocrine entity associated with anxiety and reduced prosocial behavior. However, diagnosis and clinical progress have been hindered by challenges in reliably measuring OXT due to its instability and short half-life. Neurophysin I (NP-I), an equimolarly co-released cleavage product of the OXT precursor peptide, offers a promising alternative biomarker due to its stability and longer half-life, though it requires validation. Methods: Analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study including 15 patients with hypothalamic-posterior-pituitary dysfunction and 15 matched healthy controls (according to age (+/-3), sex, body mass index [BMI] (+/-2), and menopause/hormonal contraceptives). Participants received a single oral of the strong OXT stimulator 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 100mg) and placebo, separated by two weeks. NP-I and OXT levels were measured at six time points over five hours. Subjective drug effects were assessed using visual analog scales. The area under the curve (AUC) in plasma NP-I from 0 to 300 minutes between both groups was analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression model. The AUC in receiver-operating characteristics curve (ROC) was assessed for MDMA-stimulated NP-I and OXT in differentiating patients from healthy controls. Results: The median age was 34 years [IQR 25-46] in patients and 35 years [IQR 26-48] in controls, with both groups consisting of 53% (n=8) females.In healthy controls, MDMA induced an 8-fold increase in OXT (peak: 624 pM [235-959]) and a 20-fold increase in NP-I (peak: 1508 pM [911-2233]). In contrast, in patients, no notable increase in OXT (peak: 92 pM [79-110]) and only a mild increase in NP-I (peak: 263 pM [140-300]). The AUC of NP-I after MDMA was 2279 pM·5h [1087-3696] in healthy controls and 97 pM·5h [50-241] in patients, with a significant difference of 2340 pM·5h (95%-CI [1462-3218]; p<0.0001). NP-I strongly correlated with OXT (R=0.92) and increases in subjective effects, e.g., ‘liking effect,’ ‘feeling high,’ ‘trust,’ and ‘fear reduction’ (all R>0.5). MDMA-stimulated NP-1 demonstrated strong diagnostic performance in differentiating patients with OXT deficiency from healthy controls with a ROC-AUC of 100%. Conclusion: These results validate NP-I as a novel biomarker for endogenous OXT secretion, addressing long-standing challenges in direct OXT measurement. NP-I offers novel opportunities for research in conditions where reduced OXT levels or disruptions in signaling are implicated, such as autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, and depression. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207