MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415451554 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.231

MON-473 Autoimmune Adrenalitis and an Adrenal Tumor in a 17-Year-Old Girl With Elevated 17-Hydroxyprogesterone and Secondary Amenorrhea

2025· article· en· W4415451554 on OpenAlexaff
Laurel Walfish, Liane S. Feldman, Oluyomi Ajise, Juan Rivera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFludrocortisonePrimary Adrenal InsufficiencyAdrenal insufficiencyCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaAdrenocortical hyperfunctionHydrocortisoneAdrenal disorderAdrenocorticotropic hormoneGirlHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: L. Walfish: None. L. Feldman: None. O. Ajise: None. J.A. Rivera: None. Background: Adrenal tumors can be seen in inadequately treated patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), thought to result from chronic adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) overstimulation. In patients with CAH, a characteristic finding of poor control is elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP). Similarly, it has been documented that some non-secreting adrenal adenomas can be 21-hydroxylase deficient and, therefore, also produce 17-OHP under ACTH stimulation. Scarce data exists describing autoimmune adrenalitis associated with adrenal masses and elevated 17-OHP. Case Presentation: A previously healthy 17-year-old female presented to her primary care physician for a 1-year history of secondary amenorrhea after discontinuing oral contraceptives. Progesterone challenges were negative. Notable laboratory investigations included an elevated 17-OHP at 117 nmol/L (ref. 0.6-8.0nmol/L). An abdominal pelvic ultrasound revealed a 2.7 cm right adrenal tumor. Upon presentation to endocrinology, history and physical examinations showed no signs or symptoms of adrenal hormone overproduction. Further biochemical assessment of adrenal hyperfunction was also negative. Other than an elevated renin at 464.8 ng/L (ref. 3.3-6.1) with a low normal aldosterone, the rest of her hormonal work up showed no abnormalities. Genetic analysis showed no mutation in a 12-genes CAH panel. On further questioning, the patient admitted to salt craving, morning nausea, fatigue, and spontaneous skin darkening in comparison to her twin sister. A morning cortisol resulted at 76 nmol/L (ref.120-535), ACTH > 440pmol/L (ref. 1.6-13.9), with presence of adrenal autoantibodies. She was diagnosed with autoimmune primary adrenal insufficiency (AI) and started on hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone replacement. An abdominal MRI demonstrated a 2.5x1.4x1.8cm right adrenal, well-circumscribed tumour, isointense in T2, hypointense in T1, with no loss of signal on the out-of-phase T1 sequences, in keeping with a lipid-poor lesion. A PET scan demonstrated the mass to be FDG avid at 19.4 SUV. The patient is currently waiting for laparoscopic right adrenalectomy. Conclusion: This case highlights a potential relationship between adrenal masses and primary autoimmune adrenalitis that has not been described before. Most reported cases of this type of co-occurrence have been related to adrenal lymphoma or CAH. The elevated plasma 17-OHP in our case is unusual and is suspected to originate from the adrenal tumor’s expected decreased 21-hydroxylase expression. Such deficiency would otherwise go unnoticed but has become evident under strong ACTH stimulation from the primary AI. The strong ACTH stimulation may also explain the high FDG uptake, contrasting with surrounding ongoing adrenalitis. Nevertheless, surgical removal is indicated given the lipid-poor nature of the lesion. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207