MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neural alterations in substance use disorders: A meta-analysis using activation network mapping across and within task domains

2025· article· en· W4415459694 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxime Roberge, Jules R. Dugré, Mélanie Boisvert, Stéphane Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEli Lilly Canada
KeywordsTask (project management)UnderpinningSubstance useBrain mappingArtificial neural networkNerve netNeural activityFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing number of task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies on substance use disorders (SUDs), results have been difficult to replicate. Potential reasons for the low reproducibility of neuroimaging findings include a lack of alignment with contemporary conceptualizations of brain functioning. Indeed, meta-analytic approaches often rely on univariate assumptions, failing to recognize the brain's inherently connected and dynamic nature. The current meta-analysis was conducted to address these issues and to identify whether individuals with SUDs show consistent network alterations across task domains. METHODS: We first performed a traditional coordinate-based meta-analysis (activation likelihood estimation), followed by a network-based meta-analysis (activation network mapping, ANM) of task-based fMRI studies involving individuals with SUDs. Analyses were conducted both across and within task domains. RESULTS: A total of 120 fMRI studies were identified, comprising 3113 individuals with SUDs. The traditional approach revealed spatial convergence that was restricted to a small number of brain regions both across and within task domains, and showed low reproducibility. In contrast, the ANM approach identified, with high reproducibility, a functional network encompassing the striatum, thalamus, cingulate cortices, and precuneus across task domains. Notably, while this network was consistently engaged across executive function, negative stimuli, and positive stimuli, the drug cue exposure domain revealed unique alterations within the brain's reward system. DISCUSSION: Overall, our findings emphasize the importance of adopting a network-based model of brain functioning to advance our neurobiological understanding of SUDs. They also highlight the unique neural network underpinning drug cue exposure tasks in SUDs, which aligns with the incentive-sensitization theory of SUDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.039
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207