MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415460612 · doi:10.47176/mjiri.39.122

Risk Factors of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4415460612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi, Esmaeil Mehraeen, Farid Farahani Rad, Farzad Fayedeh, Iman Amiri, Haleh Siami, Elham Emamgholizade Baboli, Ayoob Molla, Esmaeil Fakharian, Abbas Tafakhori, Negar Mousavi Ejarestaghi, Sahar Nooralioghli Parikhani, Negin Esmaeili, Soudabeh Yarmohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic subdural hematomaHematomaRisk factorComplicationEtiologyChronic diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although various factors have been proposed in connection with the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), the results obtained in previous studies have not been consistent. This study was conducted to describe the risk factors for cSDH recurrence, drawing upon the current literature, and to provide an integrative framework that links these factors with underlying biological mechanisms. Methods: In December 2024, a systematic literature search was performed using the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases. The retrieved records were screened against eligibility criteria and selected in 2 stages. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was utilized for bias assessment, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) checklist was employed to assess the methodological rigor and reliability of the selected studies and their findings. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 61 studies were retained for the systematic review. The principal risk factors associated with the recurrence of cSDH were elucidated and correlated with underlying pathophysiological processes. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and elevated postoperative neutrophil counts indicate increased inflammation. The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents reflects coagulation dysfunction, which raises the risk of rebleeding. Additional factors such as male sex, older age, larger hematoma size, and shorter drainage duration relate to anatomical and clinical vulnerability. Radiological signs, such as high hematoma density and midline shift, support the role of structural brain changes. Comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension, exacerbate vascular fragility, increasing recurrence risk. Early detection, effective postoperative drainage, and higher serum HDL levels contribute to a reduced risk of recurrence. Conclusion: cSDH recurrence results from the complex interplay of biological processes, including inflammation, coagulation dysfunction, and structural brain changes, with clinical risk factors. Recognizing and targeting these integrated pathways is crucial for improving prevention and management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Journal of the Islamic Republic of IranSame topicNeurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207