MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415467527 · doi:10.1161/jaha.125.044246

Association of Minimal Clinically Important Difference With Infarct Volume in Clinical Poststroke Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4415467527 on OpenAlexaff
Umberto Pensato, Johanna M. Ospel, Jianhai Zhang, Kazbek Barakhanov, Kõji Tanaka, Fouzi Bala, Chitapa Kaveeta, Diana Kim, Michel Shamy, MacKenzie Horn, Thalia S. Field, Brian Buck, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Richard H. Swartz, Tolulope T. Sajobi, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Andrew M. Demchuk, Bijoy K. Menon, Aravind Ganesh, Nishita Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHamilton Health SciencesManitoba HealthHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine ProgramUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaKelowna General HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Acute strokeClinical trialIschemic strokeMinimal clinically important differenceStroke volumeMyocardial infarctionBrain infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Infarct volume is an imaging biomarker of ischemic tissue injury strongly correlated with poststroke outcomes and reperfusion benefit. We aimed to evaluate the follow-up infarct volume (FIV) difference corresponding to a 1%, 5%, and 10% increase in probability of excellent functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Data are from the AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke). Patients with 24-hour infarct volume segmentations were included. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score=0-1). Associations between outcomes and FIV were investigated with regression analyses adjusted for covariates. Sensitivity analyses examined patients with noncontrast computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging follow-up and those treated versus not treated with endovascular thrombectomy. RESULTS: The study included 1478 patients (median age 74 years [interquartile range (IQR), 63-83], 48.2% female). Median FIV was 2.7 mL (IQR, 0-18.2), and 527 (35.7%) achieved excellent functional outcome. FIV was associated with excellent functional outcome: adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) per 1-mL FIV increase. The median ΔFIV corresponding to a 1%, 5%, and 10% increase in adjusted probability of excellent functional outcomes were 1.5 mL (IQR, 1.4-1.9), 7.3 mL (IQR, 6.8-9.3), and 14.6 mL (IQR, 13.6-18.2), respectively. Results were consistent across follow-up imaging modality and endovascular thrombectomy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, differences of ~1.5 mL, ~7 mL, and ~15 mL in FIV corresponded to a 1%, 5%, and 10% higher absolute probability of achieving excellent functional outcomes. These findings could inform the design of future clinical Phase 2 and proof-of-principle stroke trials that aim to use FIV as a key outcome measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart Association→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→