MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415468615 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24645-5

Understanding nature, barriers, and facilitators in addressing sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in conflict zones of Africa: A scoping review

2025· article· en· W4415468615 on OpenAlexaff
Haftom Gebrehiwot Weldearegay, Hailay Gebretnsae, April Mackey, Jodie Bigalky, Pammla Petrucka

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Security, and Conflict
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersMekelle University
KeywordsSexual violencePsychological interventionPublic healthPoison controlReproductive healthBiostatisticsEconomic JusticeSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsHealth services research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sexual and Gender Based Violence is a pervasive human rights violation that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations in conflict-affected settings. In Africa, regions such as the Demographic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, and Ethiopia's Tigray have seen the systematic use of SGBV as a weapon of war, with devastating physical, psychological, and socio-economic consequences. Despite increased attention to this issue, significant barriers persist in addressing SGBV effectively. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to map the nature, barriers, and facilitators in preventing and responding to sexual and gender based violence in African conflict zones. The review focuses particularly on contexts with ongoing or recent conflict, including Tigray, to inform interventions and identify knowledge gaps. METHODS: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O'malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple datasets including PubMed, CINAHL, Africa Journal Online, and Google Scholar. Both peer-reviewed and gray literatures from 2000 to 2024 were included focusing on African conflict-affected regions. Eligible studies were selected through a three - stage screening process and data were extracted and synthesized thematically. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included. The review identified diverse forms of Sexual and Gender Based Violence ranging from sexual slavery, rape, and torture to intimate partner violence and child marriage. Key barriers to effective response included deep-rooted socio-cultural stigma, weak legal systems, health system collapse, insecurity, limited awareness, and understanding. Facilitators included community engagement, survivor-centered and trauma informed care models, multi-sectorial coordination, legal reforms, and technological innovations such as mobile health services and digital reporting platforms. CONCLUSION: Addressing Sexual and Gender Based Violence in conflict-affected African setting requires a holistic, survivor-centered, and multi-sectorial approach. Political commitment, investment in justice and health systems, and the integration of gender-sensitive strategies into peace building efforts are essential. The review underscores the urgency for coordinated, evidence-based interventions to support survivors, prevent future violence, and contribute to sustainable peace and gender equality. Future research should rigorously evaluate these interventions' impact and scalability to inform policy and programs in African conflict settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public HealthSame topicGender, Security, and ConflictFrench-language works237,207