MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415469250 · doi:10.1177/20552076251384835

Perceptions and insights: A qualitative assessment of an AI-assisted psychiatric triage system implemented in an outpatient hospital setting

2025· article· en· W4415469250 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Oleksandr Knyahnytskyi, Jazmin Eadie, Kimia Asadpour, Callum Stephenson, Megan Yang, Taras Reshetukha, Christina Moi, Meghanne Hicks, Gilmar Gutiérrez, Anchan Kumar, Jasleen Jagayat, Saad Sajid, C. B. Patel, Christina Holmes, Amir Shirazi, Vedat Verter, Cláudio N. Soares, Mohsen Omrani, Nazanin Alavi

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreToronto Public HealthQueen's University
FundersOntario Centre of Innovation
KeywordsTriagePerceptionQualitative researchPsychiatric hospitalHospital careOutpatient clinicAmbulatory care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Canadian healthcare system is approaching a breaking point. With mental health being a leading cause of disability, innovative solutions are necessary to provide adequate care. Digital mental health programs, such as electronic cognitive behavioral therapy, have proven effective in reducing the challenges of traditional psychotherapy, such as long waitlists, stigma, geographic barriers, and time constraints. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential utility within the healthcare system, particularly in treatment recommendations and improving patient engagement. Despite the benefits that AI and digital mental health programs provide, they are rarely implemented in real-world healthcare settings. Objective: This study aims to explore patient experiences and perceptions of an AI-assisted triage system paired with a digital psychotherapy program. The objective is to highlight the potential modifiable barriers to implementing these digital systems in real-world healthcare settings. Methods: = 45) who used an AI-assisted triaging system and digital psychotherapy modules were surveyed through Qualtrics. This survey examined their perceptions of AI within mental healthcare, its utility within triaging, and their experiences with the digital psychotherapy program. Free-text survey responses were independently coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Thematic analysis revealed three major themes for clients' perceptions of the AI-assisted triage system: (1) AI as a replacement, (2) the utility of AI, and (3) AI complexity recognition. For the digital psychotherapy program, the themes were: (1) interactions with technology, (2) online therapy program structure, and (3) differential user experience. Conclusion: Participants highlighted the importance of human oversight to ensure accuracy and liked that the AI allowed them to access care faster. Suggestions for improving the digital psychotherapy program included enhancing user-friendliness, increasing human contact, and making it more accessible for neurodivergent individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.456 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital HealthSame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207