MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415474158 · doi:10.1128/mbio.01428-25

Zoonotic <i>Escherichia coli</i> and urinary tract infections in Southern California

2025· article· en· W4415474158 on OpenAlexaff
Maliha Aziz, Daniel E. Park, Vanessa H. Quinlivan, Evangelos A. Dimopoulos, Yashan Wang, Edward H. Sung, AA Roberts, Ann Nyaboe, Meghan F. Davis, Joan A. Casey, Julio Diaz Caballero, Keeve E. Nachman, Harpreet S. Takhar, David M. Aanensen, Julian Parkhill, Sara Y. Tartof, Cindy M. Liu, Lance B. Price

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesWellcome Trust
KeywordsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobialAntibioticsEpidemiologyUrinary systemZoonosisTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) is the leading cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs) worldwide and may be transmitted from food animals to humans via contaminated meat. However, the contribution of zoonotic ExPEC strains to UTIs in metropolitan areas remains unclear. We estimated the proportion of UTIs attributable to zoonotic ExPEC across eight Southern California counties. Between 2017 and 2021, we collected 12,616 E. coli isolates from retail meat and 23,483 from UTI patients, sequencing a representative subset of 5,728 isolates. Using a Bayesian latent class model trained with 17 host-associated genetic markers, we inferred the host origin of each isolate. Demographic, clinical, and antimicrobial resistance profiles were compared between meat isolates and clinical isolates inferred to be of human or food-animal origin. Most UTI patients were female (88%), with a median age of 50 years; 37% were Hispanic and 31% non-Hispanic white. Zoonotic ExPEC strains accounted for 18% of UTIs overall, rising to 21.5% in high-poverty neighborhoods. Women had a higher zoonotic proportion than men (19.7% vs 8.5%, P &lt; 0.001). Among men, those with zoonotic infections were older than those with non-zoonotic infections (median 73.0 vs 65.0 years, P = 0.028). These findings underscore the contribution of zoonotic ExPEC to the UTI burden in Southern California and the need for targeted interventions to reduce risk in vulnerable communities. IMPORTANCE Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections worldwide and are primarily caused by Escherichia coli . While E. coli is known to colonize both humans and food-producing animals, the extent to which zoonotic strains impact human disease remains poorly understood. Emerging evidence suggests that food animals may serve as an underrecognized reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). In this study, we used a genomic attribution model to quantify the contribution of zoonotic strains to UTIs in Southern California. We found that approximately 18% of E. coli UTIs were likely attributable to food animals. Individuals living in high-poverty neighborhoods had a 1.6-fold increased risk of zoonotic UTIs compared to those in low-poverty areas. These findings highlight zoonotic transmission as an important driver of UTIs and suggest that reducing ExPEC in food-animal reservoirs could help lower disease burden and address health disparities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207