MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415474306 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025da60ka3t

Real-World Data on Voclosporin for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis, Including Use of Concomitant Biologic Therapies: Analysis of the Enlight-LN Registry

2025· article· en· W4415474306 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Kamgar, Niloofar Nobakht, Laura Geraldino‐Pardilla, Leanna Wise, Amber Rosales, Barbara McIntosh, Ronald P. Flauto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsAurinia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcomitantSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusLupus nephritisImmunopathologyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Voclosporin is approved for the treatment of adults with active lupus nephritis (LN). In the Phase 3 AURORA studies, voclosporin plus MMF and low-dose glucocorticoids led to significant reductions in proteinuria while maintaining a stable eGFR for up to 3 years of follow-up. Biologic therapies are also frequently used in systemic lupus erythematosus and LN, yet information on the use of voclosporin in combination with these agents is limited. Here we describe baseline characteristics and demographics of patients enrolled in the Enlight-LN registry and detail the use of concomitant medications, specifically biologics. Methods: The Enlight-LN registry enrolled patients between March 2022 and January 2025 (NCT05337124). Enrolled patients were ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed LN who initiated treatment with commercial voclosporin prior to study consent. Patients received standard of care in accordance with usual clinical practice at each site. Results: As of April 4, 2025, data were available on 229 patients. Median (range) patient age was 34.0 (18-78), with 36.2% of patients ≤30 years; 83.4% were female. Most patients self-identified as White (43.2%) or Black/African American (38.0%); 35.4% were Hispanic/Latino. Median (range) time since first LN diagnosis was 1.6 (0-26.2) years. The majority of patients had Class V disease (31.4%), Class IV disease (20.1%), or mixed Class IV/V disease (15.7%). Median (range) eGFR was 89.3 (6-170) mL/min/1.73 m2; 10.4% of patients had baseline eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Median (range) UPCR was 2.3 (0.1-16.8) g/g; 38.2% of patients had baseline UPCR ≥3 g/g. There were 83 (36.2%) patients on voclosporin who concomitantly received treatment with a biologic including belimumab (28.4%), rituximab (4.8%), anifrolumab (3.9%) and obinutuzumab (1.3%). Conclusion: This initial analysis portrays the use of concomitant immunosuppressive biologics in LN patients treated with voclosporin. This is notable given the unique and possibly synergistic effects of these agents on the immune system. Additional analysis of the registry data will provide further clinical and mechanistic insights into the use of these multi-targeted therapeutic approaches. Funding: Commercial Support - Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→