MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415474852 · doi:10.1681/asn.20253yamgex4

Sustained Improvement in Kidney Function with Palopegteriparatide in Adults with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: Three-Year Results from the PaTH Forward and PaTHway Trials

2025· article· en· W4415474852 on OpenAlexaff
Elvira O. Gosmanova, Peter Schwarz, Lars Rejnmark, Aliya Khan, B.L. Clarke, Filomena Cetani, Stuart M. Sprague, Dolores Shoback, Lynn Kohlmeier, Mishaela R. Rubin, Andrea Palermo, Claudia Gagnon, Elena Tsourdi, Carol Zhao, Michael Makara, Bryant Lai, Jenny Ukena, Christopher T. Sibley, Aimee D Shu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal functionKidney diseasePath (computing)KidneyFunction (biology)Clinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Palopegteriparatide is a prodrug of PTH (1-34), administered once daily, designed to provide active PTH within the physiological range for 24 hours/day in adults for the treatment of chronic hypoparathyroidism. Conventional therapy for hypoparathyroidism (active vitamin D and calcium) is associated with hypercalciuria and an increased risk of CKD in these individuals. Rapid improvement in renal function after palopegteriparatide treatment initiation has been reported previously; this analysis evaluated the long-term impact of palopegteriparatide on renal function. Methods: Three-year data were analyzed post-hoc from the phase 2 PaTH Forward and phase 3 PaTHway trials, comprising randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled periods through Weeks 4 and 26 and open-label extension periods through Weeks 266 and 182, respectively. Renal function was assessed by eGFR. eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was required for eligibility. Safety assessments included 24-hour urine calcium excretion and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: At Year 3, ≥91% of participants receiving palopegteriparatide in both trials were independent from conventional therapy (no active vitamin D and ≤600 mg/day elemental calcium) and ≥84% had normocalcemia (8.3-10.6 mg/dL). Mean (SD) eGFR increased from baseline to Year 3 by 9.8 (10.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in PaTH Forward and by 8.8 (11.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in PaTHway. eGFR slope had an initial increase from baseline to 26 weeks (12.5 and 15.6 mL/min/1.73m2/year, annualized) followed by chronic slope stabilization from week 26 to Year 3 (0.6 and 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year). Mean 24-hour urine calcium levels normalized (≤250 mg/day), decreasing from baseline to Year 3 (428.0 to 174.4 mg/day, PaTH Forward; 375.6 to 162.1 mg/day, PaTHway). Most TEAEs were grade 1 or 2, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusion: Palopegteriparatide treatment showed sustained improvement in renal function, resolution of hypercalciuria, and continued safety and efficacy through Year 3 of PaTH Forward and PaTHway. Funding: Commercial Support - Ascendis Pharma Bone Diseases A/S

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryFrench-language works237,207