MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415474917 · doi:10.1681/asn.20258fvkghz3

Characterization of Clinical, Systemic, and Socioeconomic Factors That May Affect the Timing of Initial Management of Patients with Posterior Urethral Valves

2025· article· en· W4415474917 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hyunwoong Harry Chae, Xin Jin, Abdullah Abdulrahman N Alshalan, Douglas G. Matsell, Jeffrey N. Bone, Qian Zhang, Kourosh Afshar, Erik D. Skarsgard, Andrew E. MacNeily, Soojin Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)Socioeconomic statusEpidemiologyMEDLINENephrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To characterize clinical, system, and socioeconomic factors as potential barriers to healthcare access, measured by timing of posterior urethral valve (PUV) management. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed PUV patients managed at our institution from 2000-2019. Primary outcomes were time to first imaging (renal ultrasound and/or voiding cystourethrogram) and surgery. Univariate analyses assessed associations with clinical (antenatal suspicion, prematurity), system (NICU admission, transfer status, hospital distance), and socioeconomic factors. Socioeconomic status was assessed using the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) scores and quintiles, which include situational vulnerability, residential instability, economic dependency, and ethnocultural composition. Results: 62 PUV patients were included. Median age at imaging was 5 days and at surgery was 14 days. Antenatal suspicion of PUV was present in 53.3% (32/60), prematurity in 27.6% (16/58), NICU admission in 57.7% (30/52), and transfer from another hospital in 51.7% (30/58) of patients. Median distance from hospital was 69.8 km. Median CIMD scores were: situational vulnerability –0.25, residential instability –0.21, economic dependency –0.36, and ethnocultural composition –0.39. Antenatal suspicion of PUV was associated with earlier imaging (p < 0.001) and surgery (p < 0.001). Prematurity was also associated with earlier imaging (p = 0.048) and surgery (p = 0.028). Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was associated with both earlier imaging (p = 0.002) and surgery (p = 0.02). Higher ethnocultural composition scores were associated with a longer time to surgery (p = 0.05). Imaging and surgery timing were not significantly associated with transfer status, distance from hospital, or other CIMD dimensions. Conclusion: Patients with antenatally suspected PUV, prematurity, and NICU admission had earlier imaging and surgery. Most socioeconomic factors were not barriers to PUV management, but higher ethnocultural composition scores were associated with longer time to surgery. Clinical and system factors appear to primarily drive timely PUV management, though disparities related to ethnocultural composition may merit further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207