MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415476389 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025tc041868

Risk of AKI Associated with Vancomycin in Combination with Other Broad-Spectrum Antipseudomonal Antibiotics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4415476389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paulina L Gonzalez Flores, Muhammad Zain Ameer, Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman, Stefania Renzi, Udeme E. Ekrikpo, Huzaifa Abeer, G Mahmood, Ghazia Rehman, Fatima Ameer, Ashita Tolwani, Javier A. Neyra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVancomycinAntibioticsBacteremiaMEDLINEAcute kidney injuryAntibacterial agentIncidence (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In hospitalized patients with infections, vancomycin (VAN) is often combined with broad-spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics (BSAs), but the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with these combinations has not been comprehensively evaluated in previous meta-analyses. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Scopus was conducted to identify studies comparing AKI incidence, severity, and outcomes across VAN-containing combinations from inception to April 15, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Outcomes were stratified by drug combinations and patient populations (ICU vs. non-ICU, pediatric vs. adult). Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) across three criteria: patient selection, comparability and outcomes. All analyses were conducted using RevMan version 5.4. Results: A total of 89 studies, involving 162,192 hospitalized patients were included in the quantitative synthesis, with 62.5% receiving VAN-piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), 25.3% VAN-cefepime, 7.4% VAN-carbapenems, 1.6% VAN-other BSAs and 3.2% VAN only. VAN-PTZ was associated with higher risk of AKI compared to all other combinations: OR=2.13, 95% CI 1.77-2.57, I2=70% vs. VAN-carbapenems; OR=1.98, 95% CI 1.74-2.25, I2=78% vs. VAN-cefepime; OR=2.42, 95% CI 1.95-2.99, I2=50% vs. VAN-other BSAs, and also when compared to VAN alone (OR=3.06, 95% CI 2.60-3.60, I2=16%). This effect was consistent across all stages of AKI, age groups (adult and pediatric), and in both ICU and non-ICU populations. In contrast, VAN-PTZ did not differentially affect RRT need or in-hospital mortality when compared to other VAN combinations or VAN alone. Conclusion: VAN-PTZ is a common antibiotic combination to treat infections in hospitalized patients that was associated with a higher risk of AKI. Studies are needed to characterize whether the observed AKI is directly attributable to a nephrotoxic effect of VAN-PTZ and to identify high-risk patient phenotypes suitable for nephroprotective interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.043
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207