Capturing Brain Response Patterns to Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation Using Cycling fMRI: A Proof-of-Concept Study: Acquisition de schémas cérébraux de réponse à la stimulation cérébrale profonde ciblant le cortex cingulaire subgénual à l’aide de l’IRMf en cycles : étude de validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation targeting the subcallosal cingulate (SCC-DBS) is a promising therapy for treatment-resistant depression. However, the lack of a consistent, rapid behavioural response to SCC-DBS complicates the selection of optimal stimulation settings following implantation, requiring a prolonged and burdensome trial-and-error process. Immediate biomarkers of effective stimulation could overcome this problem. Methods In this proof-of-concept study, three patients with SCC-DBS implants were scanned at 3 T using a block-design paradigm in which stimulation alternated between “ON” and “OFF” states in 30-s cycles during a single 6.5-min acquisition. Scans were performed using participants’ clinically optimized parameters. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response maps were generated by contrasting DBS-ON and DBS-OFF conditions, and exploratory correlations with clinical outcome—indexed by percentage reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores at 12 months—were also assessed. Results Contrasting stimulation settings enabled the identification of regional BOLD signal changes associated with DBS, revealing consistent hemodynamic changes in several brain regions during active stimulation. Specifically, the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, middle frontal gyrus, and frontal pole exhibited decreased BOLD responses during active DBS, while the occipital cortex, middle temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and superior frontal gyrus showed increased BOLD responses. Exploratory analysis further suggested a potential correlation between precuneus BOLD signal change and clinical improvement ( R = −0.98, p permute = 0.09). Conclusion These findings speak to the utility of block-design fMRI with cycling DBS stimulation as a tool to identify objective, brain-based biomarkers of effective SCC-DBS, potentially expediting stimulation parameter selection and therapeutic optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".