Evaluation of the Comparative Efficacy of Aquatherapy Versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Motor Function and Psychosocial Well-Being in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing chemotherapy have limited access to rehabilitation support. While rehabilitation on the basis of physiotherapy has been found to enhance psychosocial well-being and motor performance, a viable substitute for this can be aquatherapy. However, no trials have currently evaluated the effectiveness of aquatherapy in this population. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the comparative efficacy of aquatherapy versus conventional physiotherapy on the motor function and psychosocial well-being of children with ALL. METHODS: We will conduct a parallel, single-blinded (participant-blinded), randomized controlled trial with embedded quantitative analysis. In total, 54 survivors of ALL undergoing chemotherapy will be recruited from the Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital in Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. The experimental group will attend a 4-week, thrice-weekly, 45-minute aquatherapy session focusing on exercise-based rehabilitation. The comparison group will receive conventional physiotherapy including standardized exercises. Assessments will be completed at weeks 0 (baseline), 4 (postintervention), and 12 (follow-up). The primary outcome related to motor function will be measured using the timed up and go test and the Pediatric Balance Scale at week 4. Secondary outcomes will include psychosocial well-being measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and functional abilities measured with the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Health service data, including length of stay in the hospital, hospital readmissions, and emergency department presentations, will be recorded. Semistructured interviews will be completed within an interpretive description framework to explore participant descriptions. The primary outcome will be analyzed using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: The trial is scheduled to commence in October 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The trial will inform future implementation of rehabilitation for children with ALL by providing important data regarding the efficacy of aquatherapy compared with conventional physiotherapy as well as patient experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry - India CTRI/2025/03/083036; https://tinyurl.com/v446cd6z. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/75877.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.039 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".