Understanding the experiences of Canadian military veterans participating in aquatic exercise for musculoskeletal pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Veterans report living with chronic pain at nearly double the rate of comparable Canadians. They have unique pain management needs, highlighting the need for further research. Aquatic exercise is one treatment option that may offer meaningful benefits. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of CAF Veterans incorporating aquatic exercise as part of their pain management routines, offering insight into its potential role in managing chronic pain among military Veterans. METHODS: Informed by interpretive phenomenological analysis, ten CAF Veterans with chronic pain and experience with aquatic exercise were interviewed. RESULTS: Three superordinate themes were constructed: Respite from the pain; reconstructing an identity as a physically capable individual; and reclaiming a sense of self and seeing a new path forward. Exercise has the potential to improve pain, function, and quality of life for individuals living with pain. Among CAF Veterans, aquatic exercise can further support personal growth, development, and recovery after release from the military. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide insight for rehabilitation providers of the positive experiences and additional impacts of participating in aquatic exercise for CAF Veterans with chronic pain. Rehabilitation providers may consider incorporating aquatic exercise into physical activity-based rehabilitation programs for CAF Veterans living with musculoskeletal pain. The current investigation was approved by and followed the recommendations of the Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board at Queen's University (REH-797-21).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".