MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415489342 · doi:10.25251/bwk6z618

A fatal case of Munchausen syndrome: Forensic dermatology aids in establishing the diagnosis

2025· article· en· W4415489342 on OpenAlexaff
Philip R Cohen, Emily M. Garritson, Joseph A. Prahlow

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology Online Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Abuse and Related Trauma
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMunchausen syndromeFactitious disorderSkin biopsyDiseaseBiopsySympathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Munchausen syndrome (factitious disorder imposed on self), a condition in which the patient intentionally injures themselves to create disease signs and symptoms, is difficult to diagnose. The affected individual not only seeks attention but also sympathy for their illness. A 31-year-old woman with cutaneous Munchausen syndrome who had persistent cutaneous ulcers and new abscesses is described; she died during her hospitalization and postmortem biopsies of her skin lesions and lungs both demonstrated polarizable foreign bodies. Fatal Munchausen syndrome has not commonly been described; including the woman in this report, we are aware of 19 decedents. The cause, mechanism, and manner of death have varied. Like our patient, the manner of death was most frequently undetermined since the circumstances did not permit accident to be differentiated from suicide. In conclusion, forensic dermatology aided in establishing the diagnosis of fatal cutaneous Munchausen syndrome in the woman we report. A biopsy of her non-healing ulcer showed polarizable foreign material that she had inoculated into her skin. Her condition involved not only self-inflicted skin abscesses, but also similar manifestations in her lungs. To prevent unnecessary laboratory tests and procedures and possibly death, healthcare providers need to consider the possibility of Munchausen syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology Online JournalSame topicChild Abuse and Related TraumaFrench-language works237,207